This is a bad idea BUT if we incorporate the 'cleaning' button as you suggest then I suggest that over time in space your screen gets gradually dirtier again until you press the button again.
I dunno, the people who are going to want it most are going to be the explorers, who want their pretty views. Do we really want to make them fly 15kly back to inhabited space to find a station to fix their w&t at or suffer the wrath of dirty windows?
That's why I proposed a simple auto-cleaner built into every ship. I mean your car has built-in defrosters.
We could make them get dirty over time, but simply turning the things off would be easy and quick for the FD to program in. Going all complicated like that would take time and money.
It should be tied to wear and tear. That would give you a motivation to not let your ship deteriorate.
It's great that the FD are so attentive to detail that they put all those scuff marks on my canopy, but I really find them annoying.
It's the 33rd century. Surely we've figured out some sort of electrical-charge or forcefield-based way to clean canopies by now?
Can I have a little button in my function screen to activate automated canopy cleaning? Get rid of (turn off) those darn scuff marks and make my canopy as perfectly sparkling clear as I by god spend the time to make my car windshield in real life? That way people who find scuff marks important for immersion can choose to pretend they don't know that thing is there and keep imperfectly cleaning their canopies by hand and leaving scuff marks, but I will get to have less of a headache.
Thanks!
I like the idea of wear and tear related scuffs on the canopy rather than the static effect we have now. I seem to remember reading somewhere that W&T would be reflected on our ships appearance. The current effect we have tends to break that immersion. Your brand new ship or freshly refurbished one, should have at least been buffed up by the salesperson trying to wangle your hard earned credits out of you.![]()
Great. Please explain to me why that means I shouldn't be able to turn them off.