Copyright Infringement?!?

TL-DR - the content and specific, unique character of a name can be IP protected in most western civilization jurisdictions, but the simple use of the name can not

Aside from the rather massive differences in legal status depending on jurisdiction for all sorts of matters, including copy and trademarks discussed here - putting that aside for the moment and speaking purely in general ->

Most states, countries, etc that we'd loosely characterize as 'western civilization' shares the common concept that you can protect the IP of a unique character (within the time range allowed for by that jurisdiction and with wildly differing terms for renewal and protected period duration), but not the simple use a name that does not otherwise denote any other information upon which to derive which person, place or thing you refer to.

Perhaps there may come a day when the lunacy of IP laws flex enough to allow literal protection of simple name devoid of any specific character reference, but until then, anyone, any company is free to use the names of 'famous people' because the defense is that -quite literally - the named object is not Michael Jackson the famous musician, but Michael Jackson the not so famous space pilot, pet rock or unicorn.
 
HAHAHA considering the damage he has done to my working environment, I hope you completely fried the BLEEP.

19th December 2015. Never forget. Note that I was actually boosting in to make sure I got to shoot him. :D

ff6f9d396e.jpg
 
TL-DR - the content and specific, unique character of a name can be IP protected in most western civilization jurisdictions, but the simple use of the name can not

Aside from the rather massive differences in legal status depending on jurisdiction for all sorts of matters, including copy and trademarks discussed here - putting that aside for the moment and speaking purely in general ->

Most states, countries, etc that we'd loosely characterize as 'western civilization' shares the common concept that you can protect the IP of a unique character (within the time range allowed for by that jurisdiction and with wildly differing terms for renewal and protected period duration), but not the simple use a name that does not otherwise denote any other information upon which to derive which person, place or thing you refer to.

Perhaps there may come a day when the lunacy of IP laws flex enough to allow literal protection of simple name devoid of any specific character reference, but until then, anyone, any company is free to use the names of 'famous people' because the defense is that -quite literally - the named object is not Michael Jackson the famous musician, but Michael Jackson the not so famous space pilot, pet rock or unicorn.

"Lunacy of IP laws" is right. When a compression algorithm (basic math that can be readily derived from first principles) or simple genes that half the human population carry can be PATENETED AS INVENTIONS fergawdssake, when patent law in 90% of countries that have it is written explicitly to EXCLUDE "discoveries" as opposed to "inventions", where folks try to claim copyright infringement against competitors using their PUBLISHED APIs...

Yeah, it gets frellin' STUPID.

Fortunately, names of NPCs in ED haven't crossed the edge of that particular lunacy yet :)
 
Back
Top Bottom