Hardware & Technical CPU to go with 1050 Ti: Would a Kaby Lake Pentium do it as a budget solution?

  • Thread starter Deleted member 110222
  • Start date
As does the Pentium G4560!

Indeed, and for a brand new budget build, I'd recommend the Pentium G4560 over any first-gen i7. Kaby Lake clocks higher, has significantly better IPC, and supports newer instruction sets...all on a much more modern and less expensive platform (good LGA-1366 boards are getting rare and expensive). Even with two cores vs. four, it's a pretty easy choice.

I was simply pointing out that the first gen i7 has really held in there. They were solid when they launched and most people still using one will struggle to find a compelling upgrade path for general use.

This probably doesn't matter much, though. As has been said, the X4 can support Windows 7,8, etc and the G4560 can't

Kaby Lake CPUs work fine in Windows 7 and even much older OSes. Pair a G4560 with a 100 series motherboard and don't plan on using the IGP, it will work just like a Skylake, because that's essentially what it is.

Intel isn't making 200 series, or Kaby Lake IGP/SoC drivers for older versions of Windows, and Microsoft isn't including any fallback, but they cannot prevent the CPU cores themselves from working normally, because they have no features (other than a tweaked turbo) that Skylake lacks.

And yes, I've tried it.
 
Last edited:
Just watched a very interesting benchmark, albeit with really crappy music (again):

[video=youtube;6ec0bw1mWrY]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ec0bw1mWrY[/video]

Yup, this little processor can match (or exceed) the AMD FX8350 (an 8 core CPU) in almost everything but Cinibench...

[video=youtube;VLl7NMQpx3o]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VLl7NMQpx3o[/video]

Doesn't put up a poor show against the i5 6400 either, definite food for thought...
 
Shouldn't be a surprise that two really fast cores are a match for eight slow cores in things that generally don't benefit from a bunch of cores.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom