While the Indoraptor was purposely designed to be a weapon, the Indominus rex was intended to be a spectacular attraction to increase guest numbers and generate interest for Jurassic World, and satisfy Masrani Global's board of investors. It was created out of entertainment, but hijacked by InGen Security to develop the weaponised dinosaur programme.
I am not so sure about that, but whatever.
Rubbish. A herbivore hybrid would be able to generate interest, a couple examples are Stegoceratops and Paramoloch.
Rubbish, there a lots of real species that could fill that role just as well, even with some particularities similar to Dilos' (surprising) poison (or Troodon's nesting habits), specially if adding flying and aquatic animals with their new and challenging characteristics. True, that would mean adding or changing significantly certain parts of the game but, let's face it, a park simulator of ground dinosaurs was done before and in some cases much better than JWE (like PK). So why not get a bit creative for a change.
A fight between this herbivore and Indominus rex would be an incredible spectacle! Interest will also be generated considering that this was an animal that was going to appear in the movie.
Yeah, as if you could exhibit animal fights in your park without having the whole world's Animal Protectors on your back.
Please, dinosaur fights might be some possibility because of nature and all but it shouldn't be something a park management should aim for. Also, I doubt very much Ingen would tolerate that, not only because of the reason stated above, but also because these animals are really expensive (specially hybrids). And I don't think you could make the return of such an animal's death just by showing the fight once (since you wouldn't be able to stop them or, if you indeed could, any of them could get so badly hurt that eventually would die), so go explain what kind of bargain would you get out of it, aside from satisfying your own blood thirst?
And, please, don't tell me that, in-game, making money is stupidly easy, because that's also something I think is really, really bugged. Even if one could have an income of "millions per minute", the costs of staff, technology, imported food both for guests and animals and all the rest would be astronomical and you couldn't ever keep increasing your income endlessly as we can now: eventually, it would stabilize and even decay. So no, I don't think it viable and, anyway, investors would always want more, so they would vote against such a sacrifice.
I concur, Frontier's attention should focus on improving the gameplay (e.g. more complex management), improving the A.I. (e.g, herds and sleeping) and general bug fixing (e.g. visitors phasing through closed doors). After these issues are sorted, then Frontier can add new attractions, amenities and animals.
Agree. So let's leave this discussion for later on, shall we?
However dinosaurs and hybrids should take priority over the pterosaurs and marine reptiles. As we've seen from the Fallen Kingdom update, the mechanics to add real and hybrid dinosaurs into JWE are already there, as well as the attractions to display them and the fences to contain them. Whereas pterosaurs and marine reptiles are a whole new frontier to develop.
I disagree on this point, as I said. Lore-wise and if they indeed want to stay true to the franchise, at least flying reptiles came first: even the original JP had an Aviary. The fact that they added Indominus and I-Raptor first, I think, was more due to time constraints and Universal's pressure than anything, but that doesn't mean that the game shouldn't have to include at least flying dinos, in my opinion, even if they came as an expansion in the first place.
Not really no; Dr. Wu's profile says that after the Jurassic World Incident, he continued his association with paleo-genetics, creating multiple hybrid species. The Indoraptor is just one of the many hybrids Dr. Wu was working on.
This doesn't prove anything, as the Indoraptor is different from the Indominus, the "multiple hybrid species" could just as well mean new versions of them both. Still, I maintain the adding of hybrids was the worst decision ever, so we agree to disagree.
And, about the "Stegoceratops" onscreen: have you consider the possibility of it being just genetic "concept art"? Maybe while Wu was researching how to hybridize he developed some non-viable projects (with this being one) until he came to breed the Indominus. The cloning process of new species was initially marked by many problems and few successes, that's stated both in the novel and TLW, and I doubt the hybridization process was flawless from the beginning. Also, after what happened with the Indominus, I doubt Ingen would allow any more, but whatever.
I am so sick of listening to people whine about the hybrids...
First of all, all the animals in the Jurassic franchise are hybrids, so much so that many look nothing like the animals they are suppose to represent... so why do "fake" hybrids get so much hate but "real" hybrids are acceptable? Fact: animals like the Velociraptor and Dilophosaurus in Jurassic Park are just as fake as the Indominus...
Second, the addition of hybrids is the natural progression of the franchise. The ability to clone dinosaurs has fallen into the hands of corrupt people with the intent to exploit it in terrible ways, what do you think such people are going to make? Normal-ish dinosaurs or terrifying super monsters?
Novel-wise they weren't. The original Wu and Hammond wanted to make dinosaurs are true as possible and aimed at having the most pure genome possible, while that indeed meant that some were "different" because of gene-splicing, they were still real animals according to the fossil register in many ways. Still, no one knows how any dinosaur would have looked like, not even those who debate that some had feathers, or were warm/cold bloodied, or whatever. Hell, there's even debate on the size some of them could have achieved or if some species are actually different age stages of the same animal. So all kinds of changed to that respects would make sense and even account for certain literary liberties of problems like Dilophosaur's poison, which also accounts for the challenge of taking care of animals no one have tried to take care before.
Yet, to say that hybridization is "the natural progress of the franchise" is to get it too far, in my opinion. There is indeed room to modifying them in many ways (adding feathers, make them more aggressive, bigger/stronger, more or less social...) and that's the base of gene-splicing that was in the original canon too (Wu wanted to make them more tame in order to get them more slow and manageable in the park atmosphere). But blending new species is something completely different, specially when they turn out to be actual and downright monsters. This is not Godzilla.