Critique and Criticism [for definition and who don't see difference]

[DjordjeDtW]

Good critique.

Critique helps man to recognize his mistakes and repair himself or what he is do.
Anyone who does something need to be self-critical or that has critics.
People who refuse to critique are incorrigible.

Literature. Music. Painting. The narrative. Sport. Games need critique.


Bad critique (criticism).

It is used to serve the people who call themselves critics.
In fact, they searching for their own identity. Which they do not have.
They use it to somebody publicly shamed or offended someone.

A good critic is the only one that criticism applies to himself.

 

[beelbeebub]

I'll just leave this here...
http://kotaku.com/five-things-i-didn-t-get-about-making-video-games-unti-1687510871
:
Criticism is good but the tone of some of the posters here is terrible. Using terms like 'stupid' and 'idiots' to describe the devs or their decisions is unacceptable and rude.
:
implying that FD are lazy/stupid/devious for not getting a particular feature finished or bug free is also bad form. I assume that the people who post these things have never missed a deadline, made a mistake, found something harder than expected. I suppose that things like spelling mistakes, typos, factual errors, hidden defects, miscommunications and old human error never happened to them.
:
Before you get on your entitled high horse have a good look at your own work and think what you'd feel like if someone with no inside knowledge of what you did and no actual ability to do what you do came along and said "you lazy idiot, why haven't you done X? Clearly you're stupid because it's easy."