Powerplay Cycle 100 Charts 'n' Stuff

Cycle-99-Charts-n-Stuff

All the charts are from the official data from the sticky in this sub forum.

Known Merits
Z2o64lx.png


Aisling was back topping the total number of merits again, with ALD and Hudson 2nd and 3rd again too.
Sirius and Winters continued being in the "second tier" of merits, with the "little 6" other powers all fairly close together as usual.

ALD had a massive number of effective merits, much of which was in their one system that they successfully prepared.
ALD was also the only power to win an expansion, but only 3k merits were needed to win because it had no opposition.

Unknown Merits
Q9JTEJP.png


Winters topped out the total opposition by a large margin, followed by Delaine, Hudson and Mahon, the usual top 4.
Undermining on Delaine was down, but it was up against Mahon, Grom, Sirius and Patreus.

ALD only had 1 system undermined, while Torval, Aisling and Antal again had 0 systems undermined.

Other Chart
bN4QNTi.png


Cycle 100 had the two Duval girls close the gap with the other 9 powers, getting closer to doing 50% of the total merits.

*edit, here's another two charts :)

kAx9Yja.png


Top chart shows the total merits needed to fortify all systems in that Power, and total merits needed to undermine all systems in that power. The second number may have this weeks consolidation bonus on it.

Bottom chart shows the average merits needed to undermine or fortify each system.

Looks like Torval has been lazy with the BGS work
 
Last edited:
I'm wondering what the Aisling players get out of all that hauling.

Good write up as usual, thanks!

Has to just be a cheap and quick way to maintain the 50 million cr, there can't be that many players just wanting to sabotage them week in and week out.
 
Cycle-99-Charts-n-Stuff

All the charts are from the official data from the sticky in this sub forum.

Known Merits
http://i.imgur.com/Z2o64lx.png

Aisling was back topping the total number of merits again, with ALD and Hudson 2nd and 3rd again too.
Sirius and Winters continued being in the "second tier" of merits, with the "little 6" other powers all fairly close together as usual.

ALD had a massive number of effective merits, much of which was in their one system that they successfully prepared.
ALD was also the only power to win an expansion, but only 3k merits were needed to win because it had no opposition.

Unknown Merits
http://i.imgur.com/Q9JTEJP.png

Winters topped out the total opposition by a large margin, followed by Delaine, Hudson and Mahon, the usual top 4.
Undermining on Delaine was down, but it was up against Mahon, Grom, Sirius and Patreus.

ALD only had 1 system undermined, while Torval, Aisling and Antal again had 0 systems undermined.

Other Chart
http://i.imgur.com/bN4QNTi.png

Cycle 100 had the two Duval girls close the gap with the other 9 powers, getting closer to doing 50% of the total merits.

It's so nice to have these reports back.
I have missed them.
Thanks a lot! :)
 
This week is a great example of how flawed the data is. Antal and Hudson are both in turmoil.

Apparantly the last minute "snipe" merits are not being taken into account. That has always been an issue with the cycle data as some older forum posts suggest.


What really gives me the creeps is this:

Cycle-99-Charts-n-Stuff

Other Chart
http://i.imgur.com/bN4QNTi.png

Cycle 100 had the two Duval girls close the gap with the other 9 powers, getting closer to doing 50% of the total merits.

Asides from me not looking forward to a bubble being dominated by the Imperial sisters, I also can't but shake my head in disbelieve about the stubborn Aisling 5C making the numbers in this chart a bit off. The Yaqueneers must be really a bunch of tight square-heads...


Also many thanks for those great charts. I hope it's ok, if I add them in my powerply chronicles thread with the due respect and reference ofc fergal.
 
Last edited:
Apparantly the last minute "snipe" merits are not being taken into account. That has always been an issue with the cycle data as some older forum posts suggest.


What really gives me the creeps is this:



Asides from me not looking forward to a bubble being dominated by the Imperial sisters, I also can't but shake my head in disbelieve about the stubborn Aisling 5C making the numbers in this chart a bit off. The Yaqueneers must be really a bunch of tight square-heads...


Also many thanks for those great charts. I hope it's ok, if I add them in my powerply chronicles thread with the due respect and reference ofc fergal.

Also, Winters' prep numbers aren't reflected on this week's charts. Data issue?
 
Last edited:
No number for LHS 1887. They did over 100k tons there. ALD's numbers for Gitse are reflected.

I'm sure I've seen this happen before when a system is in the same bubble as a system that goes through to expansion, the raw data doesn't show the merits from the other system, one of the other files may have the number in that

*edit. Yeah, the other file, the one I don't usually use which shows all of the preparations in it, has a merit number for Winters preparation, and here is the updated chart showing those merits:

8yKxyRy.png


stats show it was 130774 vs 130350 for ALD vs Winters in their preparation war.

stats also show a total of 1001 systems were prepared by the 11 powers last cycle
 
Last edited:
Lovely charts again, fergal :)

So Antal, ALD and Winters are looking best with low fortification and high undermining triggers. Now maybe it's not such a big thing that ALD is fortificating 30 to 40 systems each cycle, if each system needs not more then 2.000 merits.

Lesson learnt. Never underestimate the BGS ^^
 
Lovely charts again, fergal :)

So Antal, ALD and Winters are looking best with low fortification and high undermining triggers. Now maybe it's not such a big thing that ALD is fortificating 30 to 40 systems each cycle, if each system needs not more then 2.000 merits.

Lesson learnt. Never underestimate the BGS ^^

Much of it is bgs, but the fortification and undermining triggers are based on the distance a system is from the HQ, so the larger proportion of systems you have close, the easier fortification is and the harder getting undermined is.
 
Back
Top Bottom