^^^this.Intended or not....GOOD!!
Intended or not....GOOD!!
Intended or not....GOOD!!
You do realize that our ship's canopy is auto-tinting and brightening? Otherwise you would be permanently blinded while fuel scooping. It makes sense that the multiple tons and multi megawatt sensor systems on our ships would help with a small brightness boost to something as large as the surface of an airless planetoid. And besides, our ship instrumentation currently does a poor job of showing surface features until you are on top of them or you have your landing gear down, so why whine about the dark side surfaces having some illumination. After all, the dark side of our moon has enough illumination that film using camera's could take a non-computer aided still picture during the Apollo missions that showed surface details.
I think it depends on what is up in the nightsky, the galaxy core will still work as a lightsource that can light up the darkside to a good degree. If you are on a darkside without the galaxycore then I believe it should be dark.
Intended or not....GOOD!!
Really depends on location - actual bug was galaxy plane connected. Also this will get a rewrite for Q4 anyway, no so any changes for now are for next six months and not much longer.
All 3 of these pics were taken on so-called "Dark Sides" of planets. You can see the difference though!
All 3 of these pics were taken on so-called "Dark Sides" of planets. You can see the difference though!
But they had it right with 3.0... surfaces were perfectly dark... not completely, but as dark as one would expect it. Loved it. Now it's back to the silly fullbright pre 3.0 state![]()