Does basing Elite Explorer rank on credits gained via exploration make sense?

[LaveLubber]

I would argue this does not make sense.

As it stands an Explorer could reach Elite by detail scanning 10,000 (or x) systems each of which is one jump from the civilized bubble. This is more akin to a surveyor working for a town council than anything else.

Why can't there be multiple paths to Elite Explorer rank? Almost like a tech tree... You could then gain in rank by doing umpteen things, and it would broaden the game. For example:

• Distance from Sol traveled from Sol triggers rank increases. Reaching the other side of the galaxy and returning to sell your data (even if you didn't detail scan and earn credits) should be pretty close to Elite IMHO.
• Consistently hunting out ELW? Or Asteroid Belts? Or alien life? Progress in rank. Factions could give missions to explore certain sectors.

As it stands you basically have to detail scan x bodies to reach Elite (at 100m Cr). This is one definition of Exploring but it isn't the only one. Captain Cook performed scientifc voyages of discovery (detail scanning if you like..). Columbus set off with one specific goal in mind (travelled to other side of known universe). Marco Polo established new trade routes (a mission for a faction).

All of these are valid types of exploration... why are we limited to one route to Elite?

 

[SirFreddie]

I agree with your thinking on this and believe there should be multipliers on 'Credits gained' (As this is the simplest way of judging exploration).

But I think the multipliers should only apply to a First discovered-How far out (From Sol/a system with a station) situation.

ED already pays more for certain finds (Earthlike/Terraformable/Pristine deposits etc...) though some may argue this could be a higher monetary figure.

As for Faction missions they could also have Elite status bonuses just like they increase your Rep.

P.s. The first to map the Thargoid homeworld gains automatic promotion to Elite