Im sure someone told me that they can do a DSS from a long way away and even do multiple scans from the same place in space.
They were talking about the FSS not the DSS. You can scan every planet in the system with that and all the signal sources without moving.To use the DSS you have to get up close, like planet fills the screen close, then you can fire off the probes. There are some good Youtube videos showing how to use the DSS.Im sure someone told me that they can do a DSS from a long way away and even do multiple scans from the same place in space.
When you FSS a system which ones are the ones worth doing a DSS on? I know WW and ELW and HMC but are there others such as rocky world?
Working out what is terraformable is the tricky part. Surface temp is important IIRC, something like 250-350K. Also distance to star vs size of star determines the habitable zone. It is 1AU for stars of stellar mass 1 then follows the inverse square law I think. So a stellar mass 2 star it would be square route of 2 or 1.4AU approx. Size of planet too in the range 0.5-1.5 the size of earth. That is if you want to do it the scientific way. Or just scan all ELW’s, WW‘s, HMC’s and Ammonia worlds. We need a proper astronomer to give us the full info though. Stellar Type has an influence on habitability. The hotter stars which give off a lot of UV light break down things like amino acids which makes evolving carbon based life forms difficult. Not sure about ammonia based lifeforms though. Not looked at the biology of what an ammonia based life form would be like.Anything that is "terraformable" gives a good payout as does Ammonia Worlds in addition to your listed types.
Working out what is terraformable is the tricky part. .........
When you FSS a system which ones are the ones worth doing a DSS on? I know WW and ELW and HMC but are there others such as rocky world?