The first thought that struck my mind when reading Newsletter #40 was why in g*ds name do they use prices only (mostly) seen at chains specializing in low quality, low budget goods?
Don't they have any pride and confidence in the product?
If their marketing guys are dead set on using the old ".99" pricing trick "to pull a fast one over the slow witted", then I'd encourage them to read the following insightful paper on the subject.
Even Apple seems to regard the stuff in the paper as making sense. Just take a look at their pricing for lower cost items.
If the FD marketing guys fancy themselves having a premium product to offer, but still want to play the pretend discount game, then pricing the product at xx.95 might make more sense.
What do you guys think? Any brave and self proclaimed "dimwit" (consumer) wanting to step forth and give his/her view on what emotion a price at £39.95 evokes, compared to one at £39.99 ?
Don't they have any pride and confidence in the product?
If their marketing guys are dead set on using the old ".99" pricing trick "to pull a fast one over the slow witted", then I'd encourage them to read the following insightful paper on the subject.
We use four experiments to examine consumers' processing of comparative regular
and sale price information in advertisements. Consistent with our hypothesized
right digit effect, we find that, when consumers view regular and sale prices with
identical left digits. they perceive larger price discounts when the right digits are
"small" (i.e., less than 5) than when they are "large" (i.e., greater than 5) As a
result, they may attribute greater value and increased purchase likelihood to higher-
priced, lower-discounted items.
Even Apple seems to regard the stuff in the paper as making sense. Just take a look at their pricing for lower cost items.
If the FD marketing guys fancy themselves having a premium product to offer, but still want to play the pretend discount game, then pricing the product at xx.95 might make more sense.
What do you guys think? Any brave and self proclaimed "dimwit" (consumer) wanting to step forth and give his/her view on what emotion a price at £39.95 evokes, compared to one at £39.99 ?