General / Off-Topic ED thru the looking glass

There is this page called glassdoor.com. On it, both current and former employees write reviews of the company.
https://www.glassdoor.com/Reviews/Frontier-Developments-Reviews-E372218.htm
Frontier has a spot there. It has rather low overall score and plenty of comments from the employees actually correlate to what forum community has long suspected. All in all, it is a very interesting read.
Note: most of the positive things people have to say about the company is about actual workers. Nobody has to say anything about management.
See some rather interesting tidbits.
(Note: i archived this, so it can move to reddit, if local zealots decide to delete it.)

Advice to Management
If you take away creative control from those beneath you they will leave. It's a common problem in the games industry so you're not the only guilty company but you need to learn to delegate.

The same as most positions on the games industry, few if any chances for promotion, emphasis on seniority rather than ability.

Cons
- Overtime, lack of flexible time management
- Paternalistic upper management
- Regular redundancies
- High employee turnover rate
Advice to Management
Trust your employees


This one really hits it spot on.
Pros
Frontier/Braben has high reputation in the history of gaming. But that reputation leads to a dark side - it entails complacency and arrogance leading to mediocrity in later endeavors.
Cons
Overtime day one.
CEO was disinterested.
Code base was a mess.
Lead programmer and senior programmers thought they had achieved perfection - and they had not.
Upper management treated employees like factory components.
Unlawfully asks its employees to sign restrictive contracts after they have signed employment contracts for the job.
Game design is infantile and derivative.
Advice to Management
Learn the value the human race. While Elite was a cool game, it was not genius.


Pros
Slightly higher salary than some other Cambridge games companies. I am told by friends who are still there that they now pay overtime, and have flexi-time, which is a big perk.
Cons
When I worked there, there were redundancies almost every 3 months. The don't personally trust the management as they wouldn't be honest about situations, be it financially, or managerial in the smaller teams.
They did not provide any benefits whilst I was employed there, not even a pension, but by law this has now changed.
They seemed to be constant cycles of hiring new graduates, then making them redundant as they couldn't afford to hire in the first place, then realising they didn't have enough people, so would hire more graduates, and the cycle continued.Show Less
Advice to Management
Don't go on such big hiring schemes when you have to make redundancies 3 months later as you can't afford them. This constant cycle of redundancies lowered staff morale considerably, and it was not a pleasant atmosphere.
Cons
Constant crunch due to mismanagement of time. Reckless spending and hiring without the money to pay for it. Project was discontinued with job losses due to management failings and medling. No managers lost their jobs.
Wage reviews were repeatedly postponed for some 8 months, up until the project was canceled and folks were let go. This came right after Christmas, when just before we were being assured funds had been secured. A lie.Show Less
Advice to Management
My advice is probably not fit for publication.

Cons
There is a lot of mismanagement the scheduling is non existent or has been cleverly calculated to mean overtime is unavoidable. The pay is quite low but I hear things have improved in that regard with some pay being offered for overtime. There are no real perks to speak of past free coffee, tea and cheap biscuits and a free fast food meal if you work long enough. Also while most people do work hard there are a bunch of dead weight that they tend to keep around because of politics and greasing up the chain of command. These are poison whisperers who tend to bring down people with actual skill.Show Less
Advice to Management
Stop with the overtime and offer realistic time-scale, or if the overtime is still unavoidable make some reason for people to want to be there. Also I know the yes men are lovely to have around to stroke your ego but they are clueless and will ultimately bring the studio to its knees as proven by a huge loss and now lack of talent.

 
Last edited:
though it has to be said the hiring and firing of graduates is a time tested way to find emerging talent

but at the rate FD does it i think its more to do with being cheap than hunting quality


and those graduates will be told on day 1 by others whats happening,and the work they produce will reflect that
 
The reviews reveal a lot more about the people who made those reviews than the company itself.

Additionally most of those reviews are now years old...and this is not 'news', as I've seen this brought up before multiple times both here and on reddit.
 
Yup, old news. It's brought up every now and then.
We have no idea how things are at Frontier Headquarters atm, so take that stuff with a grain of salt.
 
This summed it up for me "They have too much creative control in the hands of too few people." (One of the more positive reviews too)

"Advice to Management

If you take away creative control from those beneath you they will leave. It's a common problem in the games industry so you're not the only guilty company but you need to learn to delegate."

Wow the more I read the more this is exactly a microcosm of the game.
 
Last edited:
LOL. Those are just about as useless as any other user reviews on the internet. (Note: I'm talking about both the negative AND positives 'reviews' here)

No context.
No details.

While I can understand the lack of details for the sake of anonymity, the fact is we simply don't know how biased or unbiased anyone doing these reviews are — A positive one can be the result of someone who is complete suckup. A negative can be a disgruntled former employee.
 
David Braben is oldschool, arrogant and complacent? I'm shocked! Tbh a lot of this is obvious in the problems they have making changes to existing code ie having to manually intervene to move stations. Sounds like an inflexible code base. Doesn't sound like a place I'd like to work.
 
LOL. Those are just about as useless as any other user reviews on the internet. (Note: I'm talking about both the negative AND positives 'reviews' here)

No context.
No details.

While I can understand the lack of details for the sake of anonymity, the fact is we simply don't know how biased or unbiased anyone doing these reviews are — A positive one can be the result of someone who is complete suckup. A negative can be a disgruntled former employee.

Yeah from the horses mouth of the people who worked there reporting on their experience working there. That is useless.
 
Wow. The overview is rather disturbing. A company with between 201 and 500 employees with a revenue of 5-10 mil USD a year? Taking the best case scenario of 201 employees and 10 mil USD revenue is an average of under $50k per employee before expenses and overhead. Considering that it costs roughly double an employee's salary to employ them (taxes, benefits, expenses, equipment, furniture, lease, utilities, etc.), that would only leave about $25k per employee and that's best case.

I can't see that as being sustainable. There must be something wrong with the numbers.
 
LOL. Those are just about as useless as any other user reviews on the internet. (Note: I'm talking about both the negative AND positives 'reviews' here)
No context.
No details.
While I can understand the lack of details for the sake of anonymity, the fact is we simply don't know how biased or unbiased anyone doing these reviews are — A positive one can be the result of someone who is complete suckup. A negative can be a disgruntled former employee.

Go look at reviews at other companies. There are differences in over score and in individual reviews. You can also gather a lot in watching, what issues are recurring and what are one off.
One toxic review is meaningless, 10 are probably relevant.

Also, these reviews actually confirm suspicion, that people on forums have about the game based on, what is visible externally.
 
Back
Top Bottom