Google Translator
Hi there,
I have noticed this many times, but again and again I assumed that I was wrong, or it was not so important because I kept smaller animals in the zoo, where the enclosure was usually mercilessly oversized anyway.
But I didn't want to chat between the polar bears now.
I noticed that Zoopedia only shows the size of the enclosure for 1 animal. At least with the hippo.
Although the minimum group size is 3 animals.
There is also no indication of how many square meters each additional animal needs.
In my opinion, this should be changed.
It should state what the minimum group size needs and then how much space you have to plan for each additional animal.
I had built a nice big enclosure for my hippos with significantly more space than the 2008sqm specified.
4000 square meters of land and almost 3000 square meters of water is not exactly little.
And assumed I could hold a larger group there.
I was clearly wrong.
10 hippos each need 5522sqm of water AND land.
Over 11,000 square meters in total.
I swallowed hard.
Two animals each need 1506sqm of water and land, but then the group size is still not suitable.
I find that very exaggerated, but no matter how it was decided and good. I'm not upset about that.
But please adjust it in Zoopedia so that you know in advance how to plan.
Now here in the sandpit it doesn't matter.
But if you do that in the challenge and the enclosure is too small due to the misleading information, and it cannot be enlarged at the point, that is really a problem.
Above all, the guests don't care if an animal eats directly in front of them, if they think they want to see a certain animal of the breed and that is at the other end of the enclosure, or even down in the trade center, all other animals are ignored.
Which of course also worsens the satisfaction of the guests and who complain about the poor view.
Thank you very much
Gabi
Zoopedia

Two Hippos

Ten hippos

Hi there,
I have noticed this many times, but again and again I assumed that I was wrong, or it was not so important because I kept smaller animals in the zoo, where the enclosure was usually mercilessly oversized anyway.
But I didn't want to chat between the polar bears now.
I noticed that Zoopedia only shows the size of the enclosure for 1 animal. At least with the hippo.
Although the minimum group size is 3 animals.
There is also no indication of how many square meters each additional animal needs.
In my opinion, this should be changed.
It should state what the minimum group size needs and then how much space you have to plan for each additional animal.
I had built a nice big enclosure for my hippos with significantly more space than the 2008sqm specified.
4000 square meters of land and almost 3000 square meters of water is not exactly little.
And assumed I could hold a larger group there.
I was clearly wrong.
10 hippos each need 5522sqm of water AND land.
Over 11,000 square meters in total.
I swallowed hard.
Two animals each need 1506sqm of water and land, but then the group size is still not suitable.
I find that very exaggerated, but no matter how it was decided and good. I'm not upset about that.
But please adjust it in Zoopedia so that you know in advance how to plan.
Now here in the sandpit it doesn't matter.
But if you do that in the challenge and the enclosure is too small due to the misleading information, and it cannot be enlarged at the point, that is really a problem.
Above all, the guests don't care if an animal eats directly in front of them, if they think they want to see a certain animal of the breed and that is at the other end of the enclosure, or even down in the trade center, all other animals are ignored.
Which of course also worsens the satisfaction of the guests and who complain about the poor view.
Thank you very much
Gabi
Zoopedia

Two Hippos

Ten hippos
