exploration boffins needed

just out on DRX's new adventure exploring various bits of the galaxy and wondered about the info on a system state. several times I have come to a system and its low security or anarchy and there is no system authorities so I wondered why do systems which are out in the black have low security or anarchy tags to them
 
It's because there's no outposts or stations - there's no security infrastructure, hence no law, hence they are technically anarchic.
 
It's because there's no outposts or stations - there's no security infrastructure, hence no law, hence they are technically anarchic.

Correct as far as the game is concerned, but still an improper use of the term. Anarchy indicates that the people in a given area are not governed. It implies that there are people. In an area where there are no people to (not) govern, the government type should be some variety of null such as blank or "none".
 
Correct as far as the game is concerned, but still an improper use of the term. Anarchy indicates that the people in a given area are not governed. It implies that there are people. In an area where there are no people to (not) govern, the government type should be some variety of null such as blank or "none".

You know, he's right isn't he? Didn't think of it like that......
 
Correct as far as the game is concerned, but still an improper use of the term. Anarchy indicates that the people in a given area are not governed. It implies that there are people. In an area where there are no people to (not) govern, the government type should be some variety of null such as blank or "none".

But if you are there then there are people in that system and if there is no government/legal system does it become anarchic? Or since you can make up the law do you become a dictator?:)

I guess what I am really saying is does the act of observing the system make it anarchic?
 
Cool to see what has been said but it's just a little confusing why they are bouncing between low security and anarchy when it's out in the middle of no where and I'm the first bit of civilisation that system will have seen
 
But if you are there then there are people in that system and if there is no government/legal system does it become anarchic? Or since you can make up the law do you become a dictator?:)

I guess what I am really saying is does the act of observing the system make it anarchic?

well.....in that case shouldn't it be 'none' until you arrive, at which time it becomes anarchy...until you depart again. Perhaps 'Lawless' would be a better description?
 
It seems that the user interface designers at Frontier are not explorers. We have the security level and our wanted status for the next jump showing up front and centre every time we engage the FSD, but the star class is relegated to the top right hand side of the screen where it can scroll by if you're not looking specifically at it.
 
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/anarchy
Definition of anarchy
1
a : absence of government
b : a state of lawlessness or political disorder due to the absence of governmental authority <the city's descent into anarchy>
c : a utopian society of individuals who enjoy complete freedom without government
2
a : absence or denial of any authority or established order <anarchy prevailed in the ghetto>
b : absence of order : disorder <not manicured plots but a wild anarchy of nature — Israel Shenker>
3
: anarchism

So I guess Anarchy seems to be a legitimate state, as it seems not to require anyone to be affected by it accoding to 1a.
 
Back
Top Bottom