I would imagine that
if this is related to Odyssey announcement (which is doubtful), it probably ties to investor displeasure with the quality of the teaser trailer. Which is a pretty unlikely scenario - investors caring about a teaser trailer
that much, I mean.
That said...
When compared to
all other trailers, even the oldest, the Odyssey Trailer is obviously third-rate in quality. It reeks of poor story design, the alpha footage is
not impressive (save for the environment) for the center-piece feature (legs), and the heavy use of text over actual, enticing imagery is baffling.
This may seem a harsh critique, but even the shiniest of white knights can't ignore
this comparison:
Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4M8ZeHZSZ3o
Compared to Odyssey trailer, it would be easy to argue we're talking about two entirely different
companies, let alone game trailers. How did the quality slide so far? Even the least astute in the gaming business - which a typical investor
might be - would see this is a HUGE drop in quality. The hype of space legs alone won't carry shoddy work very far.
If anything, it sends up red flags that space legs may very well be as poorly thought out as
Fleet Carriers that can't carry your fleet as a core service. Nevermind the littany of
other things that were wrong with FCs. Nevermind that the hype of Odyssey casts in sharp relief the
lack of hype for FCs imminently arriving. Nevermind the Odyssey trailer looks like Mass Effect
not Elite Dangerous.
Hmm. Maybe investors
did react to the trailer. I still doubt it, but I wouldn't rule it out.