Forum levels/ratings

I like how we have forum ratings based on Elite, but I have noticed a discrepancy!

Moderators! They have no ratings, I think if possible, and wanted they could also have ratings next to their titles, for example instead of "Moderator" it could read "Deadly Moderator" based on forums posts etc.
 
Deadly moderator sounds like their rating would be based on the succesful use of the ban-hammer. I'm not sure that's something that we should incentivise ;-)
 
The Moderators are a class above any Elite rating. They should be treated with more respect than even the deadliest of Elite ratings.
 
Maybe the rating could be decided by how many they've banned instead of how many posts they've made? *ducks before half the posters here get banned*
 

Sir.Tj

The Moderator who shall not be Blamed....
Volunteer Moderator
Maybe the rating could be decided by how many they've banned instead of how many posts they've made? *ducks before half the posters here get banned*


Strangely I suddenly like all the spam and advertising bot's I've banned, probably well over a couple of thousand. :cool:

It's like therapy. :D
 
Strangely I suddenly like all the spam and advertising bot's I've banned, probably well over a couple of thousand. :cool:

It's like therapy. :D
Good grief! That's a "thing"? You have to deal with that kind of stuff? Jeez, your sanity!
 

Sir.Tj

The Moderator who shall not be Blamed....
Volunteer Moderator
That amongst "other things" too. ;)

You mean these other things?

image.php



:D
 

Ian Phillips

Volunteer Moderator
We could try these ratings:

minimalist
modest
cautious
indifferent
generally good natured
limited
middle-of-the-road
intermediate
mostly humorous
average
medium
reasonable

suggestions included withnail :D
 
Last edited:
Strangely I suddenly like all the spam and advertising bot's I've banned, probably well over a couple of thousand.
Only a couple of thousand? [Master Po voice] You are young... but you will learn! [/Master Po voice]
 
Back
Top Bottom