Such a variety of replies! This is very interesting.
My intention wasn't to open a debate about
why or about
good/bad - really. There are far too many of those to contribute to already.
I'll refrain from apologizing outright for my possible misuse of the term. The definition as presented has a slight problem in that it presumes knowledge of intent. I have no such knowledge as a player who gets ambushed by a complete stranger with no communication at all (before or after) in my unengineered, essentially-stock cargo ship that has no capability against most anything else with weaponry or maneuverability, especially powerplay, PvP gear.
One could easily argue about how disproportionate the advantage was and about the inability to avoid the conflict but that's just fuel for a fire I wasn't stoking here.
In this situation, one could almost guess what many people would surmise the motivation to be. The lack of any term that approximates "malicious" isn't one that I'd expect to encounter in those instances. Whether that's right or wrong is not the care here (in my case).
I'm not angry at the event. No defending "them" is necessary in my mind. (The reasons for that are unimportant here.) The ship is utterly cheap. That's why I use it when I use it. I prefer to play in OPEN, so I know the risks, I know it happens - that's not the issue at all. In fact you can find other posts of mine that illustrate that I believe there is a role for PvP, etc. Again, I'll refrain from commenting on what I believe this was; that wasn't the intent of my post.
Again, to the group of responses to my actual questions- very interesting. I appreciate it!
Fly
dangerously carefully, CMDRs!
