http://discovery.economist.com/features/the-link-between-video-games-and-unemployment-2859140
Couldnt help but post such a controversial article here.
Couldnt help but post such a controversial article here.
http://discovery.economist.com/features/the-link-between-video-games-and-unemployment-2859140
Couldnt help but post such a controversial article here.![]()
What's wrong with spending all day in the pub?
What's wrong with spending all day in the pub?
What's wrong with spending all day in the pub?
What the article doesn't not address is how a full timer gamer life style is funded. Benefits certainly doesn't cover it.
Obviously making and selling video games is a economic activity which it doesn't address. It also give people some reason to get up in the morning. What about watching endless box sets it doesn't mention.
The Economist is full of articles that convey 0 information.
What about the people who spend all day in the pub? Or chain smoke? It also focuses on an activity associated with men a common trend reported in a negative light.
the share of jobless or underemployed young people choosing to game rather than focus on career will probably grow. That is not necessarily something to lament. Games are often rewarding and social, and time spent gaming sometimes displaces less healthy or rewarding pastimes.
The work does not deserve the importance which we give him at present. The life and the leisure activities are much more important. Life is so short and our death so close
I don't think the powers that be would let the ex wage slaves live once robots are doing all the manual labour.More people should probably feel this way.
Work is for robots. Let's hurry up and make them.
Edit:
Alors!
I take it back. Bad idea.
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/07/170705123229.htm
Without trying to steer the discussion any way, I do feel like pointing at the conclusion of the article, which seems to answer those comments.
[/FONT][/COLOR]
More people should probably feel this way.
Work is for robots. Let's hurry up and make them.
Edit:
Alors!
I take it back. Bad idea.
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/07/170705123229.htm
More people should probably feel this way.
Work is for robots. Let's hurry up and make them.
Edit:
Alors!
I take it back. Bad idea.
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/07/170705123229.htm
Thats a lot of noise about nothing. Ofcourse you can program a car to drive over dogs rather than humans when a choice has to be made. Calling that 'human moral deciscion making' is just typical academic buzzword-drivel to get uninteresting stuff published.
And what happens when we put it in weaponized drones?
What happens when the next ISIS gets automation to help?
What happens in racist regimes, totalitarian ones, when the public tries to dissent?
What happens when Blackwater gets hired in 2040?
Or when existing automation gets the values switched by hacks?
It's not about cars. It's about autonomous automation making life and death decisions. How would you feel if your ventilator numerically values your life by your gender, age and race?
What's wrong with spending all day in the pub?
I fail to see why having a computer follow a flowchart is worse than a human following the same flowchart
http://discovery.economist.com/features/the-link-between-video-games-and-unemployment-2859140
Couldnt help but post such a controversial article here.![]()