ohhhh, it's only a bug,
that's,.. what ...only inconvenient?
suspiciously-useful for powers that have more to attack with than other powers,
if you ask me.
new penalties for powers neglecting their management of the BGS in their own space, has actually made undermining/attacking EASIER, so some kind of claim that it was made more difficult by the changes that introduced both the multiplier/divider penalty/bonus system for triggers, and the newspaper-report,.. are sorry, not true, by the numbers, if your attackers were more prepared to act in the BGS, as they should be. Those wishing-to-only / can-only-be-bothered playing PP, should not have some kind of experience-veto, with which, they can attempt to justify neglecting fixing this obviously left-unfixed problem.
OK, what does all that mean? it means some ppl are getting away with cheating, under the guise of SAYING, they think that their assessment of the level of importance of one problem v another, one feature being more important, than a 'bug' fix ... is more important than correcting an obvious-scuttling/sabotage.
This feature, did, USED-TO work. the older code worked, now something does not, or something SINCE, is interfering.
maybe a bug as claimed, maybe something deliberate AFTER, it was working just-fine.
this. highlighted in red.
the yellow arrow on the zero,
is the way the tiny-number-reference wherever they are, in whichever files they're in, is meant, to be,
meant, to be displayed.
that's,.. what ...only inconvenient?
suspiciously-useful for powers that have more to attack with than other powers,
if you ask me.
new penalties for powers neglecting their management of the BGS in their own space, has actually made undermining/attacking EASIER, so some kind of claim that it was made more difficult by the changes that introduced both the multiplier/divider penalty/bonus system for triggers, and the newspaper-report,.. are sorry, not true, by the numbers, if your attackers were more prepared to act in the BGS, as they should be. Those wishing-to-only / can-only-be-bothered playing PP, should not have some kind of experience-veto, with which, they can attempt to justify neglecting fixing this obviously left-unfixed problem.
OK, what does all that mean? it means some ppl are getting away with cheating, under the guise of SAYING, they think that their assessment of the level of importance of one problem v another, one feature being more important, than a 'bug' fix ... is more important than correcting an obvious-scuttling/sabotage.
This feature, did, USED-TO work. the older code worked, now something does not, or something SINCE, is interfering.
maybe a bug as claimed, maybe something deliberate AFTER, it was working just-fine.
this. highlighted in red.
the yellow arrow on the zero,
is the way the tiny-number-reference wherever they are, in whichever files they're in, is meant, to be,
meant, to be displayed.