Hm. interesting. doesn't look like it. no o-class around the trifid nebula to see.
I should perhaps point out that, just because the star is not in or near the Trifid Nebula, does not necessarily mean the star is not in the game. Because IRL stars do not necessarily exist at the same distance as the IRL nebulae they are IRL associated with. In other words, the database of star distances and nebula distances were not correlated for logical consistency.
Eta Carinae is the perfect example of this. Out there in the real galaxy, Eta Carinae sits right in the middle of the Eta Carina Nebula - after all, the unstable supergiant star is the main reason why the nebula is visible in the first place. However, in the ED universe, the star and nebula are 1000 LY apart.
I wonder about Eta Carinae and its nebula in Elite. What we see on Earth now in 2017 is how the star (and nebula) looked 7,500 years ago. What we can see in Elite is how they might look in 3304: compared to the arrival of its light on Earth, that would be 8,800 years later. As far as I know, the star(s) and the nebula do move away from each other, although I have no idea about the exact speed. Still, that would mean the system no longer sits in the center of its nebula. A thousand lightyears in the space of almost nine thousand years still sounds a bit much to me though.Eta Carinae is the perfect example of this. Out there in the real galaxy, Eta Carinae sits right in the middle of the Eta Carina Nebula - after all, the unstable supergiant star is the main reason why the nebula is visible in the first place. However, in the ED universe, the star and nebula are 1000 LY apart.
I see what you mean. But in that case, how would one search for it?
I see what you mean. But in that case, how would one search for it?
I wonder about Eta Carinae and its nebula in Elite. What we see on Earth now in 2017 is how the star (and nebula) looked 7,500 years ago. What we can see in Elite is how they might look in 3304: compared to the arrival of its light on Earth, that would be 8,800 years later. As far as I know, the star(s) and the nebula do move away from each other, although I have no idea about the exact speed. Still, that would mean the system no longer sits in the center of its nebula. A thousand lightyears in the space of almost nine thousand years still sounds a bit much to me though.
The much smaller Homunculus nebula should still be closely around Eta Carinae, but that part's not in-game.
Yeah, me saying that it's "a bit much" was an understatement. I also meant that at least some of the distance could be explained by this, but not the entire in-game distance - I should have put things better though.Yes, I don't think there's any force in the universe capable of accelerating a supergiant star to 20% of lightspeed, without completely destroying the star in the process. The cataclysmic variability proves that Eta Carinae doesn't have much structural integrity to begin with, you can't just pick it up and push it around as if it were a solid ball. I'm afraid this, like Mitterand Hollow, has to be put down to an error in the the hand-crafted detail added to the ED galaxy.
Hm, you're probably right. I never looked up in Elite the night sky from Sol: so, it wasn't adjusted to be for the future then? To be honest, I find that a bit odd, seeing how the devs mentioned on several occasions how you could go there and the skybox would be accurate. Although I guess it still is accurate then, it could just be more accurate.And, as far as I am aware, ED does not attempt to reposition fast-moving objects in the galaxy to "where they should actually be in 3303". For the most part, they are situated "where they appear to be from the perspective of Earth in 2014". The skybox as seen from Sol is the night sky of 2014, not of 3303.
Hm. interesting. doesn't look like it. no o-class around the trifid nebula to see.