For me personally I'm feeling somewhat underwhelmed. What with the smearing and, in ED specifically, the fact that supersampling above 1 doesn't do anything apart from cause judder. For me on the DK2 I could crank up to SS 2.0 and the image was so much more crisp. With the DK2 and the new 1.3 runtime plus the ED update the resolution is much more limited and it concerns me about how much better ED can be in resolution terms with the CV1.
I was expecting some big jumps when compared to the DK2 but at the moment I'm not feeling it. No one seems that blown away by it. Maybe the DK2 was actually a pretty good representation of what the CV1 would be. It feels like there has been more work carried out on the aesthetics than anything else.
Prove me wrong...I'm happy to be !
I was expecting some big jumps when compared to the DK2 but at the moment I'm not feeling it. No one seems that blown away by it. Maybe the DK2 was actually a pretty good representation of what the CV1 would be. It feels like there has been more work carried out on the aesthetics than anything else.
Prove me wrong...I'm happy to be !