Until then, zoom out a little.A simpler solution would be for the person who designed it to have tested it on something other than his 195 inch 16k screen.
>Frontier DevelopmentsA simpler solution would be for the person who designed it to have tested it on something other than his 195 inch 16k screen.
Until then, zoom out a little.
I am sure there are other, more important things to complain to the internet about.Well yes, but it's not the simplest fix is it? One person (the designer/coder) makes a change for everybody or everybody needs to change their zoom settings, the former is by far the simpler solution.
A simpler solution would be for the person who designed it to have tested it on something other than his 195 inch 16k screen.
It doesn't matter how non-trivial the task is if someone's being paid to do a job and doesn't do it properly.Using dynamic sizing and maintaining typographic/layout consistency is usually not trivial, however. Changing zoom level is trivial. So pick your poison: 1 person making a non-trivial change, or many people making trivial changes.
Using dynamic sizing and maintaining typographic/layout consistency is usually not trivial, however. Changing zoom level is trivial. So pick your poison: 1 person making a non-trivial change, or many people making trivial changes.
No it is, in fact, trivial.
We don't have that information either way, and giving Fdev the benefit of the doubt has done nothing but come back to bite us in the collective ass so far.Unless that someone is on to another business critical task
Unless that someone is on to another business critical task. Companies everywhere prioritize workloads. The customer is not always right.
- - - Updated - - -
Not if it's dynamic content in a responsive design.
Source: Been a web dev for 15 years
Then they probably should avoid pointing people to it until it is ready.
I can't count the number of times I've shown people the zoom function on a browser and they were shocked it could do that...really, no joke.