I asked the AI about Atmospheric Worlds and it answered...

thistle

T
[VR] Mad Mike said:
I suspect the issue wasn't with the AI but with the user. AI is already used to great effect to data mine scientific journals in my field. indeed I fear the job of a scientific curators days could well be numbered
Click to expand...
No doubt, and it was probably a year and a half ago when chatgpt first exploded. At the time I'm sure even if the query had been written differently the content of the journals presumably wasn't accessible and so it just made it up.

Although as I mentioned the US govt itself seemingly did exactly the same recently, putting out evidence an AI had made up. Can't for the life of me remember what the details were unfortunately.
 

thistle

T
I'm assuming if someone were to explicitly instruct the AI to only return genuine results and respond in a particular way where real journal matches couldn't be found, it would work fine.
 

Screemonster

Screemonster
8fiaexy1wp1d1.jpeg
 

Screemonster

Screemonster
IstvaanDCIV said:
It's happened multiple times when lawyers have attempted to use ChatGPT in their work. I've no reason to believe that there would be significantly different results when attempting to use ChatGPT in a field of science.
Click to expand...
It's absolutely astounding to me how many times I've seen some variation on "well obviously it's bad at all the fields that I have personal experience with, but it's fantastic at answering questions on topics I know nothing about!" with absolutely zero deeper thinking.
 

Shurimal

Shurimal
When it comes to lawyers and legal work, things are bound to become even more complicated: a photo is generally considered a good piece of evidence. Guess with what devices 99% of photos are taken with today? Guess what these devices do to improve the image quality of the photos they take? That's right, most photos taken these days are inadvertedly AI manipulated—and it's not only the newest flagships; my 3 years old 300€ Poco has "AI camera". Normally these manipulations are very subtle and with no serious consequences, but it can become a nightmare when the machine "enhances" a 6 in a license plate to 8 or "corrects" facial features. And on a flip side, a perfectly factual photo could be dismissed as evidence because a lawyer argues that it is inadmissible due to being taken on a device that by default manipulates every photo.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom