does anyone know where it is? i read about it i think earlier on but cant find the link now.
thanks
thanks
does anyone know where it is? i read about it i think earlier on but cant find the link now.
thanks
thanks... i hate reddit, so disorganised (or i am stupid) (or both)
however i shall check it out. (not sure why he didnt do it on his own forums but still)
So I read through all of David Braben's answers and have created a helpful summary of his answers here for your delectation. Good reading:
1) Yes, we have considered it and we're looking into it. Maybe in a future release but not for a time.
2) That's very interesting. It's a good idea and we will probably consider it at some point in the future.
3) The uptake is poor so it's not a priority at the moment. Maybe in the future.
4) We would like to do something like that but it will take further consideration and discussion before we decide whether to go ahead or not.
5) Yes, I agree, something needs to be done about it. We will take it under consideration.
6) If it's possible, we will be improving it, but not just at the moment; it's not a priority.
7) We have 200 people looking at things that need improving. Looking at things, yes.
8) This is something that comes up quite often. Yes. We are going to consider this in the future.
9) Hopefully we can do something about this but there are a number of other things we need to look at first.
10) Maybe![]()
So I read through all of David Braben's answers and have created a helpful summary of his answers here for your delectation. Good reading:
1) Yes, we have considered it and we're looking into it. Maybe in a future release but not for a time.
2) That's very interesting. It's a good idea and we will probably consider it at some point in the future.
3) The uptake is poor so it's not a priority at the moment. Maybe in the future.
4) We would like to do something like that but it will take further consideration and discussion before we decide whether to go ahead or not.
5) Yes, I agree, something needs to be done about it. We will take it under consideration.
6) If it's possible, we will be improving it, but not just at the moment; it's not a priority.
7) We have 200 people looking at things that need improving. Looking at things, yes.
8) This is something that comes up quite often. Yes. We are going to consider this in the future.
9) Hopefully we can do something about this but there are a number of other things we need to look at first.
10) Maybe![]()
So I read through all of David Braben's answers and have created a helpful summary of his answers here for your delectation. Good reading:
1) Yes, we have considered it and we're looking into it. Maybe in a future release but not for a time.
2) That's very interesting. It's a good idea and we will probably consider it at some point in the future.
3) The uptake is poor so it's not a priority at the moment. Maybe in the future.
4) We would like to do something like that but it will take further consideration and discussion before we decide whether to go ahead or not.
5) Yes, I agree, something needs to be done about it. We will take it under consideration.
6) If it's possible, we will be improving it, but not just at the moment; it's not a priority.
7) We have 200 people looking at things that need improving. Looking at things, yes.
8) This is something that comes up quite often. Yes. We are going to consider this in the future.
9) Hopefully we can do something about this but there are a number of other things we need to look at first.
10) Maybe![]()
So I read through all of David Braben's answers and have created a helpful summary of his answers here for your delectation. Good reading:
1) Yes, we have considered it and we're looking into it. Maybe in a future release but not for a time.
2) That's very interesting. It's a good idea and we will probably consider it at some point in the future.
3) The uptake is poor so it's not a priority at the moment. Maybe in the future.
4) We would like to do something like that but it will take further consideration and discussion before we decide whether to go ahead or not.
5) Yes, I agree, something needs to be done about it. We will take it under consideration.
6) If it's possible, we will be improving it, but not just at the moment; it's not a priority.
7) We have 200 people looking at things that need improving. Looking at things, yes.
8) This is something that comes up quite often. Yes. We are going to consider this in the future.
9) Hopefully we can do something about this but there are a number of other things we need to look at first.
10) Maybe![]()
does anyone know where it is? i read about it i think earlier on but cant find the link now.
thanks
So I read through all of David Braben's answers and have created a helpful summary of his answers here for your delectation. Good reading:
1) Yes, we have considered it and we're looking into it. Maybe in a future release but not for a time.
2) That's very interesting. It's a good idea and we will probably consider it at some point in the future.
3) The uptake is poor so it's not a priority at the moment. Maybe in the future.
4) We would like to do something like that but it will take further consideration and discussion before we decide whether to go ahead or not.
5) Yes, I agree, something needs to be done about it. We will take it under consideration.
6) If it's possible, we will be improving it, but not just at the moment; it's not a priority.
7) We have 200 people looking at things that need improving. Looking at things, yes.
8) This is something that comes up quite often. Yes. We are going to consider this in the future.
9) Hopefully we can do something about this but there are a number of other things we need to look at first.
10) Maybe![]()
Bingo.
I don't really know why people hold Braben's words in such high esteem. He's a CEO, not an active day to day dev.
That list needs the questions too.
"Canem"
And don't forget about the bit about a roadmap:So I read through all of David Braben's answers and have created a helpful summary of his answers here for your delectation...
So not even that is clear."We have a rough internal roadmap of headline features, but it is important to have the flexibility to change that - which is why we haven't announced it."
So I read through all of David Braben's answers and have created a helpful summary of his answers here for your delectation. Good reading:
1) Yes, we have considered it and we're looking into it. Maybe in a future release but not for a time.
2) That's very interesting. It's a good idea and we will probably consider it at some point in the future.
3) The uptake is poor so it's not a priority at the moment. Maybe in the future.
4) We would like to do something like that but it will take further consideration and discussion before we decide whether to go ahead or not.
5) Yes, I agree, something needs to be done about it. We will take it under consideration.
6) If it's possible, we will be improving it, but not just at the moment; it's not a priority.
7) We have 200 people looking at things that need improving. Looking at things, yes.
8) This is something that comes up quite often. Yes. We are going to consider this in the future.
9) Hopefully we can do something about this but there are a number of other things we need to look at first.
10) Maybe![]()
Yeah, this Q&A was mostly Q and not much A at all. I don’t think there was much of anything substantial to take away from it?
Very disappointing, especially with the entire future of the game completely shrouded in secret and mystery right now. We don’t know anything at all post 2.3, the update that goes live today. A little bit of development plans would have been greatly appreciated.