...add a HC rule Server!
.
- Permanent Death
- Seperated from Solo/Group/Open
.
Anyone with me?
.
- Permanent Death
- Seperated from Solo/Group/Open
.
Anyone with me?
...add a HC rule Server!
.
- Permanent Death
- Seperated from Solo/Group/Open
.
Anyone with me?
That proposal had a safety-net though - not true Ironman!Ironman mode as a separate entity to open play was another thing that doesn't seem to have materialised. Curse you DDA!
That proposal had a safety-net though - not true Ironman!
How hard would an Ironman mode be to program, anyway? Just have it so that when your ship's destroyed it clears your save, simples!
<grins> Some of us are!You can play this way now...
Not nearly the same, becouse in real HC you know that every Player you see is a balls-of-steel as well. Right now i cant even be sure if a player i see earned his ship without logging between the modes.You can play this way now, if you enforce the penalty on yourself. Every time you die, just delete your save and start over.
Not nearly the same, becouse in real HC you know that every Player you see is a balls-of-steel as well. Right now i cant even be sure if a player i see earned his ship without logging between the modes.
I believe that no matter WHAT you asked Frontier to do,,,,,,,
If it came with a $500 price tag you would only find single digit (And a SMALL single digit) percentage of players that would pony up that kind of money.
And at the end of the day, the amount of work (hours spent coding) involved would be in the red from a labor cost view, given the amount of paying customers.
But it is a cool thought,,,,,,,,,,
The proposal in the DDA was only permadeath if you didn't hit your escape pod eject button soon enough.
I suspect FD are not happy enough with the stability and issues like combat logging and client hacks to want to deal with Ironman Mode players and their inevitable complaints (yet).
No. Its about competition. Some people like it becouse its not easy mode. Shocked?Yeah, it's an epeen thing.