You'll find the bulk of us are between 30 & 60, kinda makes it even more worrying when you flick through certain topics.
The senility ?
You'll find the bulk of us are between 30 & 60, kinda makes it even more worrying when you flick through certain topics.
seems to be around 8.![]()
If we go that route would we also need a sobriety meter...?
About the only thing I would find interesting is an indication of 'hours in game'. This might help put people's comments into some context.
I def cdoulnt' pass the breathalyzer tonight.If we go that route would we also need a sobriety meter...?
About the only thing I would find interesting is an indication of 'hours in game'. This might help put people's comments into some context.
Wouldn't it be a good idea to have users age attached to new threads so that people can make better judgements on how to respond.
e.g. the response would/should be different depending on age of poster:-
NOT FAIR THIS GAM IS POO : started by ploppy [age 12]
is more understandable than
NOT FAIR THE DEVS NO NOTHING : started by mrdog [age 33]
Or at least, if not age then guidelines i.e. schoolchild<16, student:16-25, mature:25-34. old man >34![]()
I would rather people respond to the idea/intent of the thread, instead of perpetuating stereotypes and labeling. That's just me though.