dunno about metoo, but i read that was about racism and imperialism.
really? that poem has been an inspiration for me since i was a kid, but we don't need sacred cows either. i'm not endorsing that action but everything should be subject to challenge and question and even if i have no idea if kipling himself was specially racist/machoist/whatever, his message (and he himself) is the product of a time where those were not only rampant but socially accepted. this transpires through most of the work and art of any era. recognizing that and calling it out i find it is healthy, and specially if youth do it, and it's part of the never ending cultural process of defining what it means to be human. (actually, i would look at it as yet another manifestation of art, but that's just me i guess).
then again just using a dead celebrity as a scapegoat for some agenda is completely different, no idea if that's the case.
feel the same about hergé and tintin au congo. yes, those stripes just drip racism and bigotry, which was the norm at the time, and hergé was a quite meticulous realist. rather than process this as a testament and warning of the cultural biases we come from and need to leave behind some people insist in shooting the messenger, who was just another child of his era except exceptionally perceptive and talented. stupid.