Lol Ethan, two posts, one from Dr. Jekyll and one from Mr. Hyde!
Actually I still try to self-flagellate myself for staying constructive (unlike Mr Hyde)
On a more serious line of answering, I guess that without sound and constructive (if at times emotional) feedback, FD developers won't know or have the bits of matter to convince.
@Dominic, if we can help you guys in any way for improving or argumenting improvements, just let us know.
Anyway I feel your pain. What can be done? I fear nothing. For now I have given up. I have the worst thrusters among all my friends but so is the game. They obviously think that a bit of sadism is a necessary ingredient in the recipe.
Thank you for your compassion. Feel sorry for your pain too.
Will be a pleasure to meet you in-game even if we have not top propulsion.
Maybe I'll try to unlock other engineers to spend y almost-full-because-of-another-bad-design mats reserves.
And maybe go to Quince, because even if the current good money and mats making rate there is because of another instance of bad design (I don't think it so though, there are always some places/markets/actions more mechanically worthy IRL too), at least it's rewarding.
If people making decisions at FD can maintain those bad designs too, why should we only endure the pointless and reward ones like this white knight CIF grind ? It reminds me of some things Churchill once said.
Well... and right now I'm also considering going for a fully modded Baldur's Gate 2 or Legendary XCom Long War 2, those would be way more enjoyable, coherent and rewarding.
Sure, Apurui down in the Empire.
Thank you !
+Rep deserved
