I hope that one way or another I would be on the good side of the barrier.Yes. Some of us, anyway.
However, the good side of the barrier will depend on the type of survival.
If this is the daily hell, I'd prefer to leave.
I hope that one way or another I would be on the good side of the barrier.Yes. Some of us, anyway.
It has very little inherent value; we're currently using only miniscule amounts productively, mainly in electronics and medicine, and for those purposes it's overabundant and we could stop digging up more of it and be good for a long, long time even before considering that it's easy to recycle. The vast majority goes into purely fictitious value like bullion or jewellery. In my opinion it doesn't make a vast difference if we put value in that, or in cryptocurrencies which are ultimately just made-up numbers with artificial scarcity (and their ludicrous overvaluation is yet another sign of how stupid this whole thing has become). We may as well keep it simple and just write some numbers on pieces of paper and base our economy on those oh wait.If that "worthless soft metal" (that can only be made by stars going super nova) is good enough for central banks all over the world, it's good enough for me.
I did.
And using tea leaves as a currency.Let's just go back to the barter system...
We could argue what constitutes money forever. People have.It has very little inherent value
It is forbidden to drink the money.And using tea leaves as a currency.
It worked for ancient Chinese, it would work again.It is forbidden to drink the money.
The rich could drink a lot.It worked for ancient Chinese, it would work again.![]()
Good point. They could be guying a lot of gold simply because they want to artificially jack up the prices.
It's an old trick of theirs. Buy a 100 million worth of gold. That raises the local market price by 10%. You suddenly have 110 million worth of gold.![]()
Three JPMorgan metals traders charged with market manipulation