General / Off-Topic Into Darkness: References for Trekkies

Sorry - my rebuttal of the learned gentleman above must be hidden.
Interestingly, the first point there that you list as a flaw I saw as a bonus. The rehash was a necessary hark back to an original storyline that a HUGE number of fans wanted to see, and rather than "rehash" the original storyline they made it COMPLETELY different! Other than the initial setup for that character's presence, the discovery and presence of that character and his crew were handled completely differently, and provide a HUGE contrast between the way the original universe Kirk handled the situation and how another, more militaristic mind handled it.

And I disagree with the lack of empathy and pathos - especially where Spock DIRECTLY mind-melded with Pike as he died and experienced that death - the conversation with Uhura about that showed that Spock's emotions are really writhing like snakes inside him since the death of his world and his mum and that he's ready to explode. The interesting setup for the future is that Spock has had an emotional rollercoaster much earlier in his life than Spock Prime, and hasn't had time to fully learn to control his feelings - which has been a common thread through both films in a subtle way.

The "rehashed" "saved the ship" scene was full of the same feelings and emotions as the original and garnered the same reaction from me with that added frisson of it being the other way round. Well written, well executed and different enough to be fascinating, to coin a phrase.
So there. :)

I shall conceal my rebuttal of my learned friend's rebuttal below :)

I disagree about the rehash being completely different. It's started off very well, with the illusion that Khan wasn't Khan but some guy from section 31 (I did like that reference). But once we found out about Khan, it broke down to pretty much Star Trek II all over again.

  • Khan - I want revenge. This time it's the Federation in general, last time it was Kirk
  • Kirk - I'm going to outwit you cos you're 2 centuries out-of-date. last time that made sense - Khan was 2 centuries out-of-date and didn't have experience of tactical combat in space, this time it made no sense at all, Khan was the guy who had helped the federation (albeit under duress) to forge their super-advanced combat starships so the Feds could stick it to the Klingons. Old super brain Khan should have kicked Kirk's ****.
  • The final (significant) conflict - Kirk and Khan in knackered spacecraft, Kirk pulls the wool over Khan's eyes and seriously wrecks his ship. Enterprise has a dodgy warpcore and everyone is going to die.
  • Kirk/Spock switcheroo - So Kirk does the Spock thing and Spock does the Kirk thing and Scotty/Bones do pretty much the same thing both times).

The one moment of the film that could have meant something - Kirk's death, was totally ruined by the wrath of "KHaaaannnnnn!" courtesy of Spock, honestly - I wonder how many takes it took Quinto to do that without laughing? It was horribly trite. Added to that, anyone with half a brain had already figured that Khan's blood would magically resurrect Kirk, so there was absolutely no suspense.

I remember sitting in the cinema watching Wrath of Khan, and being totally distraught at Spock's death, it still get's me now, it was undoubtedly Shatner and Nimoy's finest piece of Trek acting. The rehash left me cold. Honestly I cared more about Pike's death (which was in the first 45 minutes when the film still had promise) than I did about anything later.

McCoy was reduced to whinging one liners and analogies (which was even parodied by Kirk when he asked him to stop doing it).
Sulu had one decent line in the whole film - when he told Khan to surrender or be obliterated.
Poor old Chekov spent 90% of the film exiled off screen in Engineering.

Even Pine and Quinto, who opened so promisingly, by the end I felt it hard to believe these two guys really cared about each other. I know that they were "acting" like they cared, but the chemistry was lacking.

Saldana was the only one who I felt actually came out up from this venture, possibly because Nichols seldom got to play Uhura as anything other than talking head or comedy side kick.
 
Sorry - my rebuttal of the learned gentleman above must be hidden.
Interestingly, the first point there that you list as a flaw I saw as a bonus. The rehash was a necessary hark back to an original storyline that a HUGE number of fans wanted to see, and rather than "rehash" the original storyline they made it COMPLETELY different! Other than the initial setup for that character's presence, the discovery and presence of that character and his crew were handled completely differently, and provide a HUGE contrast between the way the original universe Kirk handled the situation and how another, more militaristic mind handled it.

And I disagree with the lack of empathy and pathos - especially where Spock DIRECTLY mind-melded with Pike as he died and experienced that death - the conversation with Uhura about that showed that Spock's emotions are really writhing like snakes inside him since the death of his world and his mum and that he's ready to explode. The interesting setup for the future is that Spock has had an emotional rollercoaster much earlier in his life than Spock Prime, and hasn't had time to fully learn to control his feelings - which has been a common thread through both films in a subtle way.

The "rehashed" "saved the ship" scene was full of the same feelings and emotions as the original and garnered the same reaction from me with that added frisson of it being the other way round. Well written, well executed and different enough to be fascinating, to coin a phrase.
So there. :)

Gotta agree with all of that. :p
 
I shall conceal my rebuttal of my learned friend's rebuttal below :)

I disagree about the rehash being completely different. It's started off very well, with the illusion that Khan wasn't Khan but some guy from section 31 (I did like that reference). But once we found out about Khan, it broke down to pretty much Star Trek II all over again.

  • Khan - I want revenge. This time it's the Federation in general, last time it was Kirk
  • Kirk - I'm going to outwit you cos you're 2 centuries out-of-date. last time that made sense - Khan was 2 centuries out-of-date and didn't have experience of tactical combat in space, this time it made no sense at all, Khan was the guy who had helped the federation (albeit under duress) to forge their super-advanced combat starships so the Feds could stick it to the Klingons. Old super brain Khan should have kicked Kirk's ****.
  • The final (significant) conflict - Kirk and Khan in knackered spacecraft, Kirk pulls the wool over Khan's eyes and seriously wrecks his ship. Enterprise has a dodgy warpcore and everyone is going to die.
  • Kirk/Spock switcheroo - So Kirk does the Spock thing and Spock does the Kirk thing and Scotty/Bones do pretty much the same thing both times).

The one moment of the film that could have meant something - Kirk's death, was totally ruined by the wrath of "KHaaaannnnnn!" courtesy of Spock, honestly - I wonder how many takes it took Quinto to do that without laughing? It was horribly trite. Added to that, anyone with half a brain had already figured that Khan's blood would magically resurrect Kirk, so there was absolutely no suspense.

I remember sitting in the cinema watching Wrath of Khan, and being totally distraught at Spock's death, it still get's me now, it was undoubtedly Shatner and Nimoy's finest piece of Trek acting. The rehash left me cold. Honestly I cared more about Pike's death (which was in the first 45 minutes when the film still had promise) than I did about anything later.

McCoy was reduced to whinging one liners and analogies (which was even parodied by Kirk when he asked him to stop doing it).
Sulu had one decent line in the whole film - when he told Khan to surrender or be obliterated.
Poor old Chekov spent 90% of the film exiled off screen in Engineering.

Even Pine and Quinto, who opened so promisingly, by the end I felt it hard to believe these two guys really cared about each other. I know that they were "acting" like they cared, but the chemistry was lacking.

Saldana was the only one who I felt actually came out up from this venture, possibly because Nichols seldom got to play Uhura as anything other than talking head or comedy side kick.

Baaaah! Humbug! Spoken like a true critic, who's paying you? Com'on fess up! :D
 
Baaaah! Humbug! Spoken like a true critic, who's paying you? Com'on fess up! :D

Hehe.

No one (I only wish they were!) :)

I'm a huge Trek fan, far more so than I am Star Wars (Episode 1 ruined it for me, though 2 was better and 3 wasn't that bad.)

I also not one of these people who cry and whine that the 2009 film was a "betrayal" and nit pick every scientific inaccuracy (they have warp drive and heisenburg compensators for (insert deity here)'s sake!). But the latest tried to be a fan flick for the old Trek fans whilst appealing to those who love pure action movies. For me it fell into the hole in the middle, I hoped for one thing, expected something else and really got neither.
 
I shall conceal my rebuttal of my learned friend's rebuttal below :)
I can see your points, but...
Re-using certain plot points can be seen by a viewer/reviewer in one of two ways depending on your preference: either copying or homage. This was done in an homage style to retain the core Khan elements: vengeance and being a ****** to Kirk.

Khan had indeed been in the "future" longer than he had before, but there's nothing to suggest that he had more knowledge of Starfleet tactics than before. He had likely been locked away in that big spacedock thing for most of his tenure. Nothing actually addresses that, to be honest, so your views on it could be as valid as mine. The root is that Kirk and the Enterprise defeated him more through luck than judgement (again harking back to the original WOK) and it was the butt-kicking delivered by a combination of Spock's fists and Uhura's phaser that put him down.

As far as his "superior intellect" is concerned, remember that a core part of Khan's psyche is that he is easily led by his emotions - it was that fact that got him defeated in Space Seed AND in Wrath Of Khan. The dear boy lost his rag yet again in Into Darkness and again it led to his defeat. Another callout to Khan or another episode of plagiarism...take your pick.

Spock's rendition of KHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAN! is no more cringing than Kirk's was back in the day, and was (I think) handled very well. Any "ham acting" is either very well-received or very thoroughly panned. I liked it. It added drama to the scene and provided a strong counterpoint to the sadness of that which preceded it. And without as much wasp chewing as Shatner's scene in TWOK.

You mention about the plot dip with Khan's blood already being capable of resurrecting Kirk - but what about the bigger plot hole (thanks for this Drew) that they didn't even need it, as they had 72 missiles with similar genetically enhanced blood sitting in the cargo bay...

I see your points though, and they are well-made. Films are a very subjective experience and people take away from them what they want. It's very rare that two people will agree on the best and worst points of a film - which is why I don't acknowledge critics and reviews much.

:)
 
Shaken, not stirred ...

Oh wait ...
No - I don't believe Khan lost his rag in Into Darkness, far from it .. he was simply blinded by his emotions towards his crew and would do anything for them, so as far as he knew they were still in the missiles. Remember when Spock#2 contacted Spock#1 to get some information about Khan I guess he learnt that Khan was ruthless, cunning, and very determined. Knowing this he did the switcheroo and voila - day was won!

The original ST2 had Khan with his superior intellect but was based upon old 20th century thinking re ship movement was odd to say the least ... Khan was not stupid and yet in the original was portrayed as such with his 2D ship piloting. That was about the only thing in that film that was wrong for me. They were on the Botany Bay .. a ship that could fly in 3-Dimensional space and yet ... bah! Can feel the blood boiling.

Also, regarding the blood, there is no evidence to suggest that his other crew members shared the same genetic properties as Khan's so whilst I do agree that there were 72 other crew members they could have tested it upon there was no way to know for sure in the time allowed. Choice - Kill Khan whilst testing the other crew members, or keep Khan "just in case" ... no choice really.
 
Last edited:
I also not one of these people who cry and whine that the 2009 film was a "betrayal" and nit pick every scientific inaccuracy

Nor am I .. the new Star Trek in its own right is just as much welcomed as the other existing TV shows / Films. I loved the 2009 version as it had a sprinkling of something we knew (mannerisms, and my god the cast they chose were perfect - Spock and Bones were the closest match to the originals :)) combined with a fresh twist on the whole canon ... One of my favourite films to be honest.

This new episode (Into Darkness) was not quite as good as the 2009 film, but was equally welcomed non the less.
 
Shaken, not stirred ...

Oh wait ...
Nice points. And I'm not talking about Spock's Ears. :)
Lost his rag = blinded by his emotions. Pretty much the same end results. He has always been portrayed as running primarily on instinct. It does hark back to the OS episode Mirror, Mirror, where Spock muses it's not easy for an animalistic, instinctive personality to act in a logical or civilised manner.

Very well said about the Spocks' conversation. Although it would have been nice to know exactly what was said, I assume that Elder Spock probably mentioned the fact that Khan's thinking is 2-dimensional, which despite the naval and literal connotations could also indicate that he has linear thinking and will pursue a goal in a straghtforward manner - not a man for using lateral thinking (despite his boasting about being a superior intellect). All that bluster always came across as quite egotistical - you'll note none of his other followers in Space Seed or TWOK say "yes, master, your thinking is what elevates you above the rest".

Note that they were prisoners on the Botany Bay - even the fiction that covers the original launch of the Botany Bay indicates that they went into stasis on launch and never really piloted the ship.

Good point on the blood, and one I do take into account to at least have one bright light on the horizon about that element... ;)
 
Wonder when ST3 will be out ? :D

You're correct - having great intellect doesn't mean you're a wise person with experience :)

Didn't know (or realise) that Khan's people were prisoners on the Bottany Bay ... that kind of makes sense now as to why, perhaps, Khan didn't have Starship experience and Spock was able to out think him. "Z-minus 10,000" :D
 
Just to chip in, the first time I came across the use of a spoiler alert was many, many yers ago when the news was something like:

*Spoiler* "USS Voyager repels Borg invasion and gains some advanced technology"

And I thought...in what way is a spoiler advanced technology? And why would it be useful in space anyway? :eek: Doh

(Or was it species 8472?)
 
Back
Top Bottom