I am curious to the reasons why or why not.
Can anyone volunteer a scientific reasoning?
I am curious to the reasons why or why not.
Can anyone volunteer a scientific reasoning?
This is just me talking off the cuff using whatever bits and pieces of scientific knowledge I've gathered over the years without citing any references, but wouldn't having liquid water on the surface almost virtually guarantee having an atmosphere? Say an icy comet impacts the surface and introduces liquid water, eventually that water evaporates into water vapor and whether it stays as the beginnings of an atmosphere depends on whether or not the planet has a magnetic field or not. For instance, I thought I read somewhere that the reason Mars doesn't have as much water as we theorize it should have is because it evaporated into the atmosphere, then the atmosphere got gradually stripped away by the solar wind because Mars doesn't have a strong enough magnetosphere to protect it.
Sure, just look inside our own solar system. Europa has liquid water covered by a thick layer of ice however, its gravity is so low that any gas that leaks out from under the ice floats away into space so, no atmosphere. The only reason there is any liquid water at all on Europa is because of tectonic activity deep inside the planet. And before anyone cries "MOON" it is only a moon because it orbits Jupiter. Europa is larger than Pluto. o7
With respect, the OP did not specify water "on the surface". See my post above. o7
However, suppose water does form vapour molecules at the surface of the planet. Why can't the planet hold on to these vapour molecules via its gravity?
Thanks for the replies & discussion!
I appreciate it now yes water cannot exist in liquid form when the pressure is below the saturation pressure for H2O.
And without an atmosphere pressing down against the surface of the planet, the pressure at the surface will remain near-vacuum.
However, suppose water does form vapour molecules at the surface of the planet. Why can't the planet hold on to these vapour molecules via its gravity?
How does a planet hold on to the nitrogen gases, the methane and CO2 (that results in becoming an atmosphere) but not to H2O vapour?
Suppose we ignore solar winds : a planet without a master star, or a planet very far away from its master star?
I don't know - we always talk about vapour, but isn't it just liquid particles in air? An aerosol?
I think yes .. but that's because the atmosphere on Earth is made up of something else, not water .. so evaporated water can be aerosol (certainly if it forms crystals) but if there's no atmosphere, then there's no (gaseous) 'solvent' for the water (vapour) to dissolve into - making it not an aerosol (but 'the' atmosphere instead?)
Especially talking about water - which is so common and fundamental to human being lives - there are loads of non-scientific words for water and it's phases. These work OK on the everyday level but on the science of it, the word used, really matters.
Sublimation for instance is I think quite specific, the phase change from solid to gas ..
I think yes .. but that's because the atmosphere on Earth is made up of something else, not water .. so evaporated water can be aerosol (certainly if it forms crystals) but if there's no atmosphere, then there's no (gaseous) 'solvent' for the water (vapour) to dissolve into - making it not an aerosol (but 'the' atmosphere instead?)
Especially talking about water - which is so common and fundamental to human being lives - there are loads of non-scientific words for water and it's phases. These work OK on the everyday level but on the science of it, the word used, really matters.
Sublimation for instance is I think quite specific, the phase change from solid to gas ..
You need a high temperature to evaporate water or even allow for liquid phase. AFAIK the lowest temperature you can get liquid water at would be around 250K or so at quite ridiculous pressure, and you wouldn't get proper vapour once you get there, just a supercritical something. It's not easy to get all threeSo lets say a planet with an icy surface, far away from its sun (to make solar winds negligible) - could have an atmosphere that is made up of water molecules but not dissolved in air because there is no other gas present. Right?
Distance from sun makes no real difference.So lets say a planet with an icy surface, far away from its sun (to make solar winds negligible) - could have an atmosphere that is made up of water molecules but not dissolved in air because there is no other gas present. Right?
So lets say a planet with an icy surface, far away from its sun (to make solar winds negligible) - could have an atmosphere that is made up of water molecules but not dissolved in air because there is no other gas present. Right?
I recommend "Fiasko" by Stanislaw Lem.
I am curious to the reasons why or why not.
Can anyone volunteer a scientific reasoning?