It feels to me like it's in 50% of all posts. People saying "(I know) Planet Coaster is not perfect". Why do they have to assure everybody that (a) PC is not perfect and (b) they're aware of the fact?
It's a true statement, absolutely, but It's sort of a given, right? No game is perfect, ever. It is literally impossible to make a perfect game. Frontier could slave away for years and still would not produce a perfect game. So instead of saying "PC is not perfect" you might just as well say "PC is a game". Duh! But hey, you're not wrong with that statement.
It's interesting though that this line is preferably followed by a "but". "I know it's not perfect but I'm having fun with it!" Again, true statement and good for you enjoying the game.
It's not useful in a discussion though because what you're really saying is "PC is a game but I'm having fun with it". There's no meaningful correlation between "not perfect" and "fun". (Also "fun" is a matter of pure personal opinion. Technical sophistication, gamedesign etc. are things that you can judge on more than the way it makes you feel. Anyway)
It's something completely different in a sentence like this: "RCTW is a crappy game but I'm having fun." Or this "PC is a great building game but I'm not having fun with it."
Now those are statements that actually say something.
But you knew all this, so why am I bringing it up? Because the line is used in replies to posts that point out issues with PC.
In this context it works with a false premise: Replying to criticism with "I know it's not perfect but..." is making it seem like someone made the demand that PC should be perfect (which is a ridiculous demand, of course).
So what the statement does is it shifts the focus of the discussion from what was said to something else. Also it seems to say "I aggree with you" but it's not (because PC being a game was never in question). It downplays/ dismisses the issues that have been raised and paints the poster in a bad light (only stupid unreasonable jerks would demand perfect games in a world where perfection doesn't exist!).
If it's true that you know PC is not perfect you should be able to simply acknowledge an issue. It might not bother you, alright. But if you want to defend PC come with real arguments. (Btw. I don't think PC (or Frontier) needs to be defended.)
TL;DR It's a common fallacy to misrepresent what has been said ("I know it's not perfect...") to make it easier to attack ("but...").
It's a true statement, absolutely, but It's sort of a given, right? No game is perfect, ever. It is literally impossible to make a perfect game. Frontier could slave away for years and still would not produce a perfect game. So instead of saying "PC is not perfect" you might just as well say "PC is a game". Duh! But hey, you're not wrong with that statement.
It's interesting though that this line is preferably followed by a "but". "I know it's not perfect but I'm having fun with it!" Again, true statement and good for you enjoying the game.
It's not useful in a discussion though because what you're really saying is "PC is a game but I'm having fun with it". There's no meaningful correlation between "not perfect" and "fun". (Also "fun" is a matter of pure personal opinion. Technical sophistication, gamedesign etc. are things that you can judge on more than the way it makes you feel. Anyway)
It's something completely different in a sentence like this: "RCTW is a crappy game but I'm having fun." Or this "PC is a great building game but I'm not having fun with it."
Now those are statements that actually say something.
But you knew all this, so why am I bringing it up? Because the line is used in replies to posts that point out issues with PC.
In this context it works with a false premise: Replying to criticism with "I know it's not perfect but..." is making it seem like someone made the demand that PC should be perfect (which is a ridiculous demand, of course).
So what the statement does is it shifts the focus of the discussion from what was said to something else. Also it seems to say "I aggree with you" but it's not (because PC being a game was never in question). It downplays/ dismisses the issues that have been raised and paints the poster in a bad light (only stupid unreasonable jerks would demand perfect games in a world where perfection doesn't exist!).
If it's true that you know PC is not perfect you should be able to simply acknowledge an issue. It might not bother you, alright. But if you want to defend PC come with real arguments. (Btw. I don't think PC (or Frontier) needs to be defended.)
TL;DR It's a common fallacy to misrepresent what has been said ("I know it's not perfect...") to make it easier to attack ("but...").