Might know why framerate is so crap.
- Thread starter Gypsy12
- Start date
And the frame rate hasn't improved, and GPU graphs show very high utilization, which means they STILL haven't done optimization yet. Forest for the trees my guy, Forest for the trees.
That has more to do with your hardware, in that your system is so robust, it can power past the lack of optimizations. So kudos to you, not Fdev.
Interestingly since the last update im getting around 40fps on planet surfaces at 1440p with a rx480, in space now getting upto110 fps.
This is up from when it launched. Station concourses are still awful at around 20-25 fps.
Im playing at high settings 1.0 supersampling. CPU is an I7920 from 2008
This is up from when it launched. Station concourses are still awful at around 20-25 fps.
Im playing at high settings 1.0 supersampling. CPU is an I7920 from 2008
Nope. Not sure what that has to do with anything.
Yeah Elite loves Nvidias--hates AMDs.
I'm about to swap my 6900 XT out for my wife's (my old) 2080TI, just to play Elite normally. Nobody seems to have problems with the 2060s and 2070s.
I am having no problems with an Asus Rog Strix 1080Ti OC Edition Card so far
Deductive reasoning based on the fact frame rates and gpu utilization stats aren't changed when compared to Alpha. If optimization was done, even a little bit you would expect to have better frame rates and lower utilization numbers because the game would be using the GPUs more efficiently. This is why every patch people are asking "Are the frame rates better" because at some point Fdev will do the optimization pass and BOOM, the stats will just be better.
Your forum name has -VR- in it, hence I was wondering when you referred to 1080p whether you weren't playing VR for a reason. But I guess the VR in your forum name is just a random couple of letters, so never mind...
Performance in VR is crap.
Yep, lost around 30% performance in vr compared to Horizon using a Ryzen 5800x and a rtx3080. That and the fact that looking at the ship UI and at planet terrains hurts my eyes since there are some ui/terrain elements that are not correctly rendered in 3D and in both eyes. Definetely ready for release!Your forum name has -VR- in it, hence I was wondering when you referred to 1080p whether you weren't playing VR for a reason. But I guess the VR in your forum name is just a random couple of letters, so never mind...
Performance in VR is crap.
I'm running a pretty old laptop with very low settings. Occasionally there are massive holes in the parking bay, which I can walk over while looking down at a lower level of the station - there are cables, doors and basic decor visible. I thought this was a little strange, that's something that should be hidden would have detail - much less than the bits that were supposed to be there, but way more than would be necessary if the floor had actually rendered.
Not sure if this is evidence of anything, but does match the descriptions given of what shouldn't be there.
Just so you guys know. Uninstalled Horizons oddly by getting rid of the CQC crap. Freed up a lot of disc space. Glad of that because LiDAR is a hog. Still runs like crap. Maybe Horizons is necessary for cool looking planets? I went to Sol to check out the "Europa" style planets. Jupiter was a blue grid. Europa was a blue mess. I havent been there in at least 4 years.
Do you believe everything you read?
Yeah, haven't been playing in VR lately. And I won't play in VR until the legs part is properly supported in VR too.Your forum name has -VR- in it, hence I was wondering when you referred to 1080p whether you weren't playing VR for a reason. But I guess the VR in your forum name is just a random couple of letters, so never mind...
Performance in VR is crap.