What do you want to bet we'll have a mining SLF as one of the ships?
What do you want to bet we'll have a mining SLF as one of the ships?
What do you want to bet we'll have a mining SLF as one of the ships?
I would bet against that.
Primarily because a Ship Launched Fighter would not mine, and if it did it would not be a SLF. It would literally be a SLM, and also such a thing serves next to no purpose what-so-ever.
I wouldn't bet either way, Frontier in the past have seemed highly interested in the idea of a mining SLF. If not i'd expect some kind of controllable limpet or something with the new mining updates, unless we are using catapults to position explosives on fault lines and such.
Semantics and all, since you stressed it so much let me indulge a second and explain why you are incorrect:
You are correct that the defined term by the developers is ship launched fighter, its written right there in the outfitting text. If a dedicated "mining SLF" came out the name for it has not yet been defined so for the purposes of describing it using SLF as a term is the best since it references something that currently exists and explains how it would differ. SLM means nothing to anyone except you who just made it up and could confuse people. I know that acronym on it's own would mean nothing to me without context.
The OP could have described it as "smaller mining ship that comes out of the same hangar the SLF do" but it's a bit of a mouthful and a mining SLF makes it clearly and easily understandable what they mean.
Is this where I link a Dream On video?
I'll believe it when I see it...
It still wouldn't be an SLF, for the very reasons we both know it wouldn't be. You've already acknowledge that SLF is an acronym for Ship Launched Fighter. Your refusal to accept that a miner and a fighter are functionally different or just not wanting to give the new launchable a new acronym doesn't make me incorrect. Mining Assist Shuttles work better for you? MAS hangars? An MAS is not an SLF in function so it would benefit from having a different name to distinguish it from it's combat counterpart. They would be very different creatures.
I'm not saying they couldn't exist, I was really just playing when someone suggested a "fighter" should "mine". Though if they did exist they'd be less useful than a limpet that automatically gathers what a ship blasts off those rocks. It might be fun to fly through asteroid fields with a nimble machine and collect bits of things, but a limpet is still better at it.
What do you want to bet we'll have a mining SLF as one of the ships?
What do you want to bet we'll have a mining SLF as one of the ships?
That would be amazing, limpets could work well in conjunction with a mining slf.
It still wouldn't be an SLF, for the very reasons we both know it wouldn't be. You've already acknowledge that SLF is an acronym for Ship Launched Fighter. Your refusal to accept that a miner and a fighter are functionally different or just not wanting to give the new launchable a new acronym doesn't make me incorrect. Mining Assist Shuttles work better for you? MAS hangars? An MAS is not an SLF in function so it would benefit from having a different name to distinguish it from it's combat counterpart. They would be very different creatures.
I'm not saying they couldn't exist, I was really just playing when someone suggested a "fighter" should "mine". Though if they did exist they'd be less useful than a limpet that automatically gathers what a ship blasts off those rocks. It might be fun to fly through asteroid fields with a nimble machine and collect bits of things, but a limpet is still better at it.
I would bet against that.
Primarily because a Ship Launched Fighter would not mine, and if it did it would not be a SLF. It would literally be a SLM, and also such a thing serves next to no purpose what-so-ever.