mythical animals

[xesta]

wouldn't that be just so cool?? ok listen

I would kill a man to have a dragon exhibit or even something more cryptid like jackelopes? unicorns, gryphon, kirin, manticore, chupacabra, basilisk, cockatrice, hydra, cerberus, etc

I highly doubt it'll happen but I can dream of my fantasy dlc pack :")

 

[Mjmannella]

Animals beyond what's in zoos would be great. Though I'd prefer recently extinct animals over mythical creatures.

 

[Merit Selket]

No thanks. Both Ideas should be a completly own game, I would be interested in both of these games, just do not want to have this sort of animals (mythical or extinct) in Planet Zoo.

 

[Joël]

wouldn't that be just so cool?? ok listen

I would kill a man to have a dragon exhibit or even something more cryptid like jackelopes? unicorns, gryphon, kirin, manticore, chupacabra, basilisk, cockatrice, hydra, cerberus, etc

I highly doubt it'll happen but I can dream of my fantasy dlc pack :")

Hayo,

I have moved your thread to the Wishlists forum.

Also, I hope that the killing of a man will be limited to a virtual man in a videogame

 

[LN]

Nah, no thanks.

 

[MaximusSC]

How often would each of these mythical creatures breed and how long would they live?

I can imagine how much arguing and complaining would be done and said about the birth rates and longevity of the mythical creatures and no one would be right because there simply isn't any information to justify anyone's points of view to this regard.

 

[Barje]

hope not

 

[Leopard Lobbyist]

A few cryptid animals would actually be really cute as an April Fool's DLC or community gift I think.

 

[Aero-Bubbles]

Planet zoo and zoo tycoon are very separate games, and have very different messages and directions.

I’m sorry, but no, there’s enough real animals that deserve to be in Planzoo, we don’t need made up creatures!

 

[Mjmannella]

Planet zoo and zoo tycoon are very separate games, and have very different messages and directions.

I’m sorry, but no, there’s enough real animals that deserve to be in Planzoo, we don’t need made up creatures!

"We"?

 

[Aero-Bubbles]

"We"?

That’s how to properly form that sentence, can you please not look that far into it.

I didn’t say “no one wants that”

 

[Mjmannella]

The proper formation would be "I don't want this".

 

[Aero-Bubbles]

It doesn’t matter, and again that’s not what I said “we don’t need this” as it fits in what I was getting across, it is not in any way speaking for a group, I didn’t say “ we don’t want this” it isn’t the same thing.

 

[Mjmannella]

"We" is a plural term used to refer to multiple people including oneself. Using "we" means are are indeed speaking for a group. So it should definitely be "I don't need this".

 

[Aero-Bubbles]

There is a difference, like I said, between “we don’t NEED this” and we don’t want this. We don’t need this implies that there are so many living animals, planet zoo doesn’t need to add mythical animals. If I had said “ we don’t want this” it would have implied I was speaking for multiple people.

Needing and wanting are 2 very different things

 

[FoxyDee]

Mythical animals would add exactly zero educational value to the game I think.

There are hundreds living animals that would be awesome in game, but guess people find them too boring and have to imagine things. In my honest opinion I think mythical animals would not fit in this game. Even less than extinct ones.

But each to their own I guess. I for one would not buy such dlc.

 

[m2wester]

I like the idea of adding mythical creatures. I'd probably limit them to sandbox and a szenario or 2, or introduce other restrictions to seperate them from "real" animals. I don't think they wouldn't fit into the game as a fun little addition.

That being said, there are other animals that I think are way more important. For the forseeable future, I'd prioritize other stuff - Australia, Europe, marine animals, South America and possibly an aviary dlc are things I'd want before mythical creatures

 

[Barje]

therr's literally humongous amount od Animals from mamy families that can be implemented to a zoo game, penguins,kangaroos,Anteater,sloths,koalas,gibbons,lla....theres really over enough real Animals worth mention,do WE don't need imaginary fairy ones.Btw i remember how mythical creatures ruined ARK for me,which wasnt even mean to be an educational game.

 

[LN]

The proper formation would be "I don't want this".

It's we.

As in us.

And my answer to this question would still be "no".

I just think it's dumb to have "imaginary" animals in a zoo game about real animals.

And in case people wonder, no I wouldn't buy it either and rather have Frontier invest time more wisely.

There is a difference, like I said, between “we don’t NEED this” and we don’t want this. We don’t need this implies that there are so many living animals, planet zoo doesn’t need to add mythical animals. If I had said “ we don’t want this” it would have implied I was speaking for multiple people.

Needing and wanting are 2 very different things

You are allowed to speak for me in this specific case.

 

[Mjmannella]

It's we.

As in us.

Aero was referring only to them-self (see "it is not in any way speaking for a group"). "We" being a plural term means it can only be used if referring to a plurality of something (multiple or a group of something including oneself). Using "we" in a singular sense is incorrect.
There's also the fact the there's no other people mentioned in their comments, so the others apart of the "we" have no stance to begin with.