General / Off-Topic New 26,000-pound dinosaur discovery was Earth's largest land animal

https://www.azfamily.com/new--pound...cle_4260e115-746e-5317-9829-815a0104dd27.html
5bada1063c13e.image.jpg

This figure shows some of the preserved elements of the newly discovered dinosaur.

If humans had lived 200 million years ago, they would have marveled at the largest dinosaur of its time. It's name means "a giant thunderclap at dawn."

The recently discovered fossil of a new dinosaur species in South Africa revealed a relative of the brontosaurus that weighed 26,000 pounds, about double the size of a large African elephant.

The researchers have named it Ledumahadi mafube, which is Sesotho for "a giant thunderclap at dawn." Sesotho is an official South African language indigenous to the part of the country where the dinosaur was found.

"The name reflects the great size of the animal as well as the fact that its lineage appeared at the origins of sauropod dinosaurs," said Jonah Choiniere, study author and paleontology professor at the University of the Witwatersrand in Johannesburg, South Africa. "It honors both the recent and ancient heritage of southern Africa."

Apart from its massive size, there are other evolutionary details about the new species that make it entirely unique, according to a new study published Thursday in the journal Current Biology.

"It shows us that even as far back as 200 million years ago, these animals had already become the largest vertebrates to ever walk the Earth," Choiniere said.

Finding a new dinosaur
Choiniere's graduate student, Blair McPhee, discovered the bones of an unknown dinosaur in 2012.

"Blair told me how important he thought it was, and even showed me that some of its bones were still sticking out of the rocks in the field," Choiniere said.

Over years of excavation, the team uncovered the fossil of a fully-grown adult dinosaur, likely about 14 years old when it died.

Ledumahadi was a close relative of sauropod dinosaurs, like the brontosaurus and others that ate plants and walked on all four legs. But the fossil shows that it evolved earlier, and independently, of sauropods.

Sauropods had a posture and thick, column-like limbs that are very similar to elephants. But they evolved from ancestors that walked predominantly on two legs. Adapting to walk on all fours allowed sauropods to grow larger and supported the digestive process needed for their herbivore diet.

The researchers believe that Ledumahadi was a transitional dinosaur, an evolutionary experiment itself during the Early Jurassic period. The forelimbs of this dinosaur are more "crouched," while being very thick to support its giant body.

"The first thing that struck me about this animal is the incredible robustness of the limb bones," said McPhee, lead study author. "It was of similar size to the gigantic sauropod dinosaurs, but whereas the arms and legs of those animals are typically quite slender, Ledumahadi's are incredibly thick."

The researchers wanted to find out whether or not this dinosaur walked on two or four legs, so they developed a new method to test it. They compiled data of dinosaurs, animals and reptiles that walked on two or four legs, including leg measurements and thickness. Comparing the data from the fossil with this dataset enabled them to determine Ledumahadi's posture.

While the method helped them determine that Ledumahadi walked on four legs, it also revealed that other early similar dinosaurs were also experimenting with walking on all fours.

"The evolution of sauropods isn't quite as straightforward as we once thought," Choiniere said. "It appears that sauropodomorphs evolved four-legged postures at least twice before they gained the ability to walk with upright limbs, which undoubtedly helped make them so successful in an evolutionary sense."

Location is key
The newly discovered dinosaur is a close relative of gigantic dinosaurs that lived during the same time in Argentina, which supports the idea that all of the continents were still assembled as Pangea, a supercontinent made up of most of the world's land mass during the Early Jurassic.

"It shows how easily dinosaurs could have walked from Johannesburg to Buenos Aires at that time," Choiniere said.

When it roamed the land 200 million years ago, Ledumahadi lived in South Africa's Free State Province, but it looked very different then. Instead of the mountainous area that it is now, the land was flat and semi-arid, with shallow streams that could easily dry out.

And Ledumahadi was just one of many dinosaur species in the area.

"There was a thriving dinosaur ecosystem here in South Africa, at the bottom of the world, featuring 12 ton giants like Ledumahadi, tiny carnivores like Megapnosaurus, the earliest mammals, some of the earliest turtles, and many, many others," Choinere said.

He and his team are continuing to look for fossils in South Africa from the Triassic and Jurassic periods.

Ledumahadi also adds to the list of remarkable discoveries made in South Africa.

"Not only does our country hold the Cradle of Humankind, but we also have fossils that help us understand the rise of the gigantic dinosaurs," said South Africa's Minister of Science and Technology Mmamoloko Kubayi-Ngubane in a statement. "This is another example of South Africa taking the high road and making scientific breakthroughs of international significance on the basis of its geographic advantage, as it does in astronomy, marine and polar research, indigenous knowledge, and biodiversity."
 
There was no reason to quote the entire (poorly written CNN fluff piece) article. Plus, your title is wrong. Thirteen tons does NOT make it the largest land animal.
 
Last edited:
While the new discovery interesting, regardless of size inaccuracies, that is just a terrible name for a dinosaur. If you were to mention that in a conversation i would have absolutely no idea what you're talking about if i hadn't heard the name before, you could be talking about a new kind of spiced latte for all i know. I suspect this animal will get renamed or given a second, more scientific name later on as others have before.
 
Last edited:
There was no reason to quote the entire (poorly written CNN fluff piece) article. Plus, your title is wrong. Thirteen tons does NOT make it the largest land animal.

That was the title of the article. I was too laughing at this article of how ignorant and stupid these people are. It's cool that they discovered a new dino, but yeah the size is not the largest.

Link is here -> https://www.azfamily.com/new--pound...cle_4260e115-746e-5317-9829-815a0104dd27.html

Not that big at all!
ledumahadima.jpg
 
Then something is terribly off with this article.
It's a CNN fluff piece, trying to be "diversified". So yeah, it's off alright. It's why I called it poorly written, and channel 5 in Phoenix should be ashamed of reprinting it. It shows why promoting an agenda (whether left or right) is ridiculous (and I don't think any sane
person on earth can not see the agenda trying to be pushed in this article...made even more ridiculous as it predates humans by 200My) .

omg...this is almost as an article as a flat earth article...I really don't want to do this here, but CNN realllllllllllllyyyyyy wants to show life is "diversified"...
 
Last edited:
AT THE TIME!!!!!!!!

I've been seeing this headline everywhere and it makes me so incredibly mad.

CNN, Fox, even NPR and National Geographic had the same click-bait title.

I've been raging out about it for the past few days.

..... I don't see an agenda though, other than BEING WRONG.
 
made even more ridiculous as it predates humans by 200My).

Well to be honest, alot of scientists have found man made artifacts dating back to 200 million years old. At least that's what they claim. Not sure I believe it, but why not. Anything is possible. Who would've thought 200 years ago, that a telephone would be possible. It's pretty interesting. Alot of documentaries on the subject as well.
 
Back
Top Bottom