General Gameplay New buildings/Customization abilities in regards to park building.

Your Feature Request / Idea
One of the main things that Is missing from this game is real customization to make the parks feel more realistic and immersive. We have plenty of dinosaurs and plenty of fences, plenty of generic buildings and plenty of paths. I'm going to break down into three main categories of customization. Landscaping, Building, Accessories.

Landscaping: We can edit the terrain up and down, we can add water, we can add generic foliage, but that is it. I can't make real rivers, I can't make waterfalls, I can't really place individual trees, bushes, or shrubs/flowers. These things are necessary to create an immersive park with depth and decoration. I will be able to place trees or flowers around paths and such, I can customize enclosers to my exact desires with rivers or even waterfalls.
Right now I can make apparent rivers, but there is no flow of water, and it must be flat to make because otherwise I'll have to separate bodies of water on different levels that cannot connect due to the inability to create a waterfall. Possibly allow us to add in geysers, hot springs, or edit terrain to dirt, sand, normal grass, or rain-forest floor to add some extra personality to the park.

Buildings: It goes without saying the buildings in this game are very generic compared to Planet Coaster. They are very well done, but every park feels the same with the same exact buildings with no customization ability. I'd like to create my own buildings, or at the very least have more options where I can have 3 different versions of the gift shop of different sizes and designs. If we could just create our own buildings with certain "blocks" like in Planet Coaster this game could be everything it aspires to be. It doesn't have to be as in-depth as planet coasters building system, but at least give us customization options where I can have a taller hotel, or a different designed hotel, rather than plopping 3-4 of the same hotel around my park. It's not realistic, creative or immersive.
Furthermore, if I could customize the size of the viewing galleries width wise, or adjust the height of the viewing towers, that would be very cool. Along with adding the classic jeep ride and balloon from JPOG. I'd also enjoy being able to edit the entrances to my park. Instead of the bland, generic monorail, perhaps Instead I can place a main entrance lobby where helicopters land and then folks can get out from there and enter the park, or have a shipyard where cruise ships arrive, or add Safari jeep transport for some variety from the monorails.

Accessories: The game completely lacks in this category. There is no ability to add fountains, multiple types of statues, flags, signs with my own custom descriptions of enclosers (I really appreciate the ability to name dinosaurs and this would work in tandem perfectly with that), trash cans, benchs, chairs and tables for eating areas, etc. Not to mention there is a complete and utter lack of bridges being able to be built. I can't make realistic rivers where visitors can walk over on a bridge path.

Lastly I wish visitors were more unique and I could click on them to see their name, or what they prefer and such. I miss that from JPOG and Planet Coaster. Perhaps this could be very feasible and realistic if we were given a large island from scratch to create our perfect version of Jurassic Park whether in sandbox or with money like the challenge mode. The Isla Nublar only gives us a specific area with a pre-made entrance monorail. The game just seems too restrictive in the creative sense for park building, but does it well when it comes to the individual dinosaurs being able to add names, different genes, and skins. I'd gladly pay $20 for a DLC that adds everything I've described here.
 
These are all amazing ideas. I would kill for customizable buildings,but at this point I am just cool with some pre-made skins. You could have 1993 turn buildings into the bamboo walls and grass hut roofs.
 
I agree with your ideas and support them 100% though I would argue that we do not have enough fences and we definitely do not have enough paths...we have 3 and that's it. :D
 
Had a building idea today. How about a tower restaurant building. They have these in canda and seattle has one i think. It's a tower with a restaurant on top that slowly revolves around in a circle. You could place it inside a paddock for a copl2 visitor experience. The entrance would be like a gyro station but instead of taking a gyro it would just be a tunnel entrance. Enter the entrance and guest get to the tower and take an elevator to the top.

Some simple out of the box building ideas would help keep park building interesting.
 
Agreed. All of this - except with 'no clip' mode. Nothing would be more irritating to have all of this stuff only to have it say 'can't place here.'
 
Another 5 stars here. I completely agree with everything said.

In fact, my main issues with the building system, since I play mostly on Sandbox (the other modes are just annoying) are twofold:

1) Terrain constraints: it's not only the inability to create waterfalls, but also the already tiny available space even more limited if you have to flatten or edit the map-border terrain. About the rest of the points, well, I wouldn't be a fan of making multiple landscapes on such small maps, but I certainly could do with different forests, grass-types, etc

2) Attractions. Even more important than having new restaurant buildings, I think it is much more important to have new ways to help the visitors enjoy the dinosaurs. Cretaceous Cruise, Jungle Trek, Dino-Delta, and many, many more cool ideas posted everywhere such as tube-like paths, underground viewing domes, or even combinations of attraction and facility as the viewing tower/restaurant suggested above are much more needed, in my opinion. Also, the ones we already have need big improvements too: the visual field when inside a Gyrosphere is unrealistic and just wrong; the inability to link two Gyrostations is absurd also; the range of the visual field both in Viewing Galleries and Viewing Towers, without taking obstacles into account is also ridiculous...
 
Back
Top Bottom