Can you explain your idea and comment at the same time?
I tried. Are you trying to solve crime, or trying to make crime
impossible? Making it impossible, solves very little. A cool down, is still a cool down; whether people idle at the menu, or stuff off to another system such as anarchy, the outcome is mostly the same. It's an
interruption; that's the point, I beleive.
And the people who are going to idle versus just paying it off, aren't engaging in their nefarious deeds. So which is better; nefarious deeds continuing,
or an interruption. Pick one. One can disagree with a thing,
without necessitating that it's removed. I personally think UA bombing is a bit ordinary. But I'm not about to demand it's removal; it's possible to seperate the two considerations.
People idling rather than endlessly racking up the kills regardless, might be a counter-intuitive thing to argue against; just as an aside. Frontier want to induce a few more consequences; not remove entire groups of people from the game (it's hard to tell on occasion as Sandy's intentions cab be chaotic; they are still fairly evident, however).
Essentially; it's accountability. There's more accountability. This isn't the same as evicting people from an island because they aren't liked very much.
I don't think detention C&P counts for speeding stuff.
If you mow down another ship because your expedited exit (or entry) is more important, then you may find yourself in jail, yes. Because a murder, is a murder. The game doesn't give one tot
how it's earned. This is intentional.
