With this month coming to an end, checking out Elite: Dangerous Steam Charts we can see that Odyssey has caused player numbers to drop compared to before the expansion with a difference of 7712 - 9386 = -1674.
The total loss compared to the player numbers during the launch of the expansion and now is -3244.
That is an all time record for player loss for Elite: Dangerous on steam (and 4th place in relative percentage loss).
And before anyone of you show up and tell me "But steam charts aren't covering the whole playerbase!" yes, we know captain obvious. So?
Steam charts display a good representation of player numbers because there usually is no difference between steam players and non steam players. So unless anyone can come up with a proper reasoning why relative steam player numbers should somehow be more affected than total player numbers (which we don't know), this argument is considered invalid.
With that cleared I guess the most obvious conclusion is that Odyssey has brought the game more harm than good and it would have been better without the release of Odyssey.
Dropping player numbers is (imo) a good thing because that's a language FD is speaking. Since english isn't their natural way of communication (anymore), alternative means of communication need to be used to get a message through to FD management.
So what am I trying to say here? Nothing much really except for: I am proud of ya'll! I personally didn't invest in FD as a whole company since 2018 and reduced my playtime since Odyssey to around 0h.
But one player doesn't mean a thing. Only through the effort of your refusal will there be a chance that FD wakes up and changes course. Albeit it's most likely a small chance, it's certainly a higher chance than kindly asking for change through social media and these forums for the reason mentioned above.
Keep it up (or down in that case). Actions speak louder than words do.
The total loss compared to the player numbers during the launch of the expansion and now is -3244.
That is an all time record for player loss for Elite: Dangerous on steam (and 4th place in relative percentage loss).
And before anyone of you show up and tell me "But steam charts aren't covering the whole playerbase!" yes, we know captain obvious. So?
Steam charts display a good representation of player numbers because there usually is no difference between steam players and non steam players. So unless anyone can come up with a proper reasoning why relative steam player numbers should somehow be more affected than total player numbers (which we don't know), this argument is considered invalid.
With that cleared I guess the most obvious conclusion is that Odyssey has brought the game more harm than good and it would have been better without the release of Odyssey.
Dropping player numbers is (imo) a good thing because that's a language FD is speaking. Since english isn't their natural way of communication (anymore), alternative means of communication need to be used to get a message through to FD management.
So what am I trying to say here? Nothing much really except for: I am proud of ya'll! I personally didn't invest in FD as a whole company since 2018 and reduced my playtime since Odyssey to around 0h.
But one player doesn't mean a thing. Only through the effort of your refusal will there be a chance that FD wakes up and changes course. Albeit it's most likely a small chance, it's certainly a higher chance than kindly asking for change through social media and these forums for the reason mentioned above.
Keep it up (or down in that case). Actions speak louder than words do.