I have been improving some flatrides last week and it works wel for most. But i am having some trouble with Pathos. In an effort to give this pretty thing a colorfull sequence i tested each "trick" separatly, as i did with other rides. I wrote down the stats for each of the 15 manouvres. Then made a sequence with the most exciting moves and a simple one for start and end.
I figured EFN would come at around E5.50 F5.00 N4.10
So i tested... E1.70 F5.50 N 7.30. Nowhere near average, nausea above the maximum (N4.80) of any seperate move.
How is that possible? Did i screw up somewhere?
So i made an all-EFN-max- sequence of 8x topspinturnflip: E6.20 F5.50 N4.80. That is the same average as the single move test.
Then added 1 top flip in the middle of the sequence. Results according to calculated average.
Added another top flip in the middle. Again predictable results.
Moved both topflips to start and end: horrible stats.
Experimented a bit more with comparable weird results.
So now i have a statistical great sequence for Pathos 3, but with only 2 different moves.
Can anyone explain this?
I figured EFN would come at around E5.50 F5.00 N4.10
So i tested... E1.70 F5.50 N 7.30. Nowhere near average, nausea above the maximum (N4.80) of any seperate move.
How is that possible? Did i screw up somewhere?
So i made an all-EFN-max- sequence of 8x topspinturnflip: E6.20 F5.50 N4.80. That is the same average as the single move test.
Then added 1 top flip in the middle of the sequence. Results according to calculated average.
Added another top flip in the middle. Again predictable results.
Moved both topflips to start and end: horrible stats.
Experimented a bit more with comparable weird results.
So now i have a statistical great sequence for Pathos 3, but with only 2 different moves.
Can anyone explain this?
