I have been building a Diamondback Scout in the past days, trying to find the coolest running I can get it with all modules active. I lurked the net for some ideas and I read somewhere, I think it was on Reddit, that using a lower class power plant would reduce the resting heat level. I only found that mentioned that one time (and I can't find it anymore) and I'm not entirely sure this should be right.
From my knowledge, the only thing that would affect latent heat levels is the heat efficiency of the power plant, i.e. going for a A-grade regardless of the module class should give the same results. That's how I fit my ship all the time and why I run my explorer Asp with an overcharged 2A (but mainly to get lowest mass possible).
I've already slapped grade 3 low emission power plant on a 4A (I have to account for the reduction of power capacity), but before I go ahead and test an overcharged 2A, I wonder if anybody would have a definitive answer.
TL;DR
Does reducing PP class reduce base heat generation or was that reddit guy wrong?
From my knowledge, the only thing that would affect latent heat levels is the heat efficiency of the power plant, i.e. going for a A-grade regardless of the module class should give the same results. That's how I fit my ship all the time and why I run my explorer Asp with an overcharged 2A (but mainly to get lowest mass possible).
I've already slapped grade 3 low emission power plant on a 4A (I have to account for the reduction of power capacity), but before I go ahead and test an overcharged 2A, I wonder if anybody would have a definitive answer.
TL;DR
Does reducing PP class reduce base heat generation or was that reddit guy wrong?