Anybody can give me some insight as to whether prismatic shields are really superior to regular shields?
I currently have a 6C shield generator on my Clipper. It's optimal mass is 540t and the max is 1350t. My Clipper is 609t unladen and 769t laden. When I look at the prismatic shields, like the description says, they use a lot more power and weight a lot more too. In term of mass, I would need to get the 6A prismatic shield to match my regular 6C shield. Yes, it's apparently much more powerful but I just cannot afford 24M CR right now.
What would be the downside of using a lower class prismatic shield, like the 4A or the 5A? The 4A is rated for an optimal mass of only 285t and max of 713t while the 5A is rated for an optimal mass of 405t and max mass of 1013t.
Anybody can shed some light on this? I'm not even sure I understand what the optimal mass and maximum mass affect the shield efficiency!
Thanks in advance!
I currently have a 6C shield generator on my Clipper. It's optimal mass is 540t and the max is 1350t. My Clipper is 609t unladen and 769t laden. When I look at the prismatic shields, like the description says, they use a lot more power and weight a lot more too. In term of mass, I would need to get the 6A prismatic shield to match my regular 6C shield. Yes, it's apparently much more powerful but I just cannot afford 24M CR right now.
What would be the downside of using a lower class prismatic shield, like the 4A or the 5A? The 4A is rated for an optimal mass of only 285t and max of 713t while the 5A is rated for an optimal mass of 405t and max mass of 1013t.
Anybody can shed some light on this? I'm not even sure I understand what the optimal mass and maximum mass affect the shield efficiency!
Thanks in advance!