An amazing ship if built right, the Python mk2 is a combat king...
You can mix up the load out on the Pmk2 – PA's, rails, Multicannons, cannons, etc. I've even seen a build running all burst lasers. It's quite flexible with a bit of engineering.IMO it’s a boring, one-trick-pony of a ship and a huge missed opportunity. Not only is it limited in the gameplay it can do, it’s even limited in the loadout it can use for said gameplay.
You can mix up the load out on the Pmk2 – PA's, rails, Multicannons, cannons, etc. I've even seen a build running all burst lasers. It's quite flexible with a bit of engineering.
Its a combat ship, designed for combat. It might not be great at some of the other activities Elite has to offer, but it's one of the best at what it's designed for.
I'm personally not a fan of multi-purpose ships, as they tend to do a lot of things decently well, but never the best. You end up with a ship that is very run-of-the-mill. A jack of all trades, master of none. I much prefer dedicating a ship to a particular role. And boy does the Python mk2 deliver in that respect. It's a master of combat for sure.
You can mix up the load out on the Pmk2 – PA's, rails, Multicannons, cannons, etc. I've even seen a build running all burst lasers. It's quite flexible with a bit of engineering.
Its a combat ship, designed for combat. It might not be great at some of the other activities Elite has to offer, but it's one of the best at what it's designed for.
I'm personally not a fan of multi-purpose ships, as they tend to do a lot of things decently well, but never the best. You end up with a ship that is very run-of-the-mill. A jack of all trades, master of none. I much prefer dedicating a ship to a particular role. And boy does the Python mk2 deliver in that respect. It's a master of combat for sure.
The only things it isn't are bulk cargo hauler and long-range exlorer. It can do all the other tasks comfortably.IMO it’s a boring, one-trick-pony of a ship and a huge missed opportunity. Not only is it limited in the gameplay it can do
Pacis are the current "meta", but pacis are the best class 3 gun no matter the ship. You can slap 3 of them on a Krait MKII and it would still be probably the best loadout on that ship, too. My Chief uses pacis and has helluva kick to it, if I decide to rebuild my FAS for human combat (it's set up for auxiliary AX now), I'd put pacis on it.it’s even limited in the loadout it can use for said gameplay.
Yep, there was a reason that a quad pacifier Anaconda was a build that was rated as among the most destructive in the game.The only things it isn't are bulk cargo hauler and long-range exlorer. It can do all the other tasks comfortably.
Pacis are the current "meta", but pacis are the best class 3 gun no matter the ship. You can slap 3 of them on a Krait MKII and it would still be probably the best loadout on that ship, too. My Chief uses pacis and has helluva kick to it, if I decide to rebuild my FAS for human combat (it's set up for auxiliary AX now), I'd put pacis on it.
There are other weapon loadouts you can use effectively on PII. Multicannons, efficient PA-s, pulse lasers, packhounds. They won't be as "efficient" as four pacis, but nothing stops you from using them. The only dedicated medium combat ship that has class 7 distro is Gunship, all others have class 6. The Delacy's menage a trois of multiroles is a clear anomaly—frankly, the class 7 distro on multirole ships is completely OP and should've been class 6 all along.
But if you are still producing the best multi role ship why would you build a direct competitor when you could build something that will get you into another set of customers.I get your point, but it does seem strange to me to follow up the best multi role ship in the game with a dedicated fighter.
FWIW, my P2 handles any PVE combat in the game and carries both a 4A fuel scope and an extra 3C fuel tank..Sure it can fit other weapons but it’s best used as a shield tank with low distro/power draw weapons. There’s a reason everyone posting their amazing P2 builds are all running shield tank frags.
They could have at least given it a bigger fuel tank as a quality of life feature so it doesn’t have to hobble system to system begging for fuel. It can’t even properly fit a fuel scoop without making significant compromises.
Naming it Python MKII is an odd decision by the Delacy marketing department, I personally would have chosen something like Python Aggressor so it wouldn't sound like a replacement for the OG Python, but whatever, corpos have always been bad at naming their products![]()
To be honest, there is an in-lore precedent of MKII of a ship being completely different from the MKI--from good ol' Faulcon-Delacy, no less. I'm talking about Krait MKI and MKII, of courseThat’s more what I was thinking. Making a dedicated fighter from the bones of a Python has logic, but as you say the Mk II implies an improved model or at least a reimagining of a ship in a similar niche - like the Vipers III & IV.
I have a 4A fuel scoop, a 3H Guardian FSD booster, and 2C and 1C fuel tanks. I'm good.FWIW, my P2 handles any PVE combat in the game and carries both a 4A fuel scope and an extra 3C fuel tank..
But did you skip hull day?I have a 4A fuel scoop, a 3H Guardian FSD booster, and 2C and 1C fuel tanks. I'm good.![]()
Sorry, that went over my head. What is 'hull day'?But did you skip hull day?![]()
Just look up "skipping leg day meme".Sorry, that went over my head. What is 'hull day'?