If there were an actual ironman mode, I'd play it, and my ideal version of the game would be Open-only ironman, but I have no particular interest in handicapping myself relative to everyone else.
Last edited:
PvP Question for PvP'ers
- Thread starter VR Jay Le Chardon
- Start date
If there were an actual ironman mode, I'd play it, and my ideal version of the game would be Open-only ironman, but I have no particular interest in handicapping myself relative to everyone else.
I like a challenge when I PvP, but I'm not constantly looking to be challenged. Even PvPers need to chill sometimes. Everyone's different some people will probably even disagree with what I've said. But to answer you OP it's because we don't want to grind constantly to get PvP capable all over again. We just want to shoot each other and have fun (most of the time anyway 
)
)
That's an excellent idea! But wait! There's more! Arm-wrestlers should have their arms chopped off when they lose! And professional fighters should fight to the death! Football teams that lose should be executed! And so on.
Goose4291
Banned
Because (as one of the many people who was more tham a little irked when they pulled the proposed Iron Man mode) it doesnt work without all parties in the same instances adhering to the same rules.
To be lazy (and paint a slightly dramatic picture), lets say you and I lock horns in Open, and Im playing to my own weird e-bushido code whereas youre not. This means we're pitting someone for who defeat or death is a potentially big thing against someone for whom it isnt, leaving me considerably hamstrung to begin with.
Its why suicide eagles wouldnt be a thing in an ironman environment (because of the legwork station ramming would involve for our wannabe griefer), but is a regular-ish occurance with the current system.
Goose4291
Banned
Prettt much my sentiment.
The Replicated Man
T
Believe it or not I have actually done this OP. Full Ironman
You did it once and then asked yourself, "Oh no, what have I done?!?"