Real World Theme Parks real life huge extravagant rides

Why dont we see really extravagant coasters in real life?

In PC there is obviously no limit to ones imagination. you can go really extreme, not just in terms of violent rides but in terms of length, height, number of loops, tunnels.

Why dont we see real life rides that mimic some of the huge creations we see in planet coaster? Does it only come down to real life construction cost?

:)
 
It's not just construction costs, but also the space required. A lot of theme parks don't have the land available for a huge scale roller coaster. But even when they do, they have to factor the costs into their profit margins. So theme parks typically work 3 years in advance, so a new ride will be planned, then money made available for it, then time to plan it all out and build it.

Take Fury 325, for example. Its a huge ride, B&M's second giga coaster. It cost $30,000,000 (30 million USD), and required an extension of the theme park along with a remapping of the park entrance, car park, and roads.
Fury_325_Layout_Rendering.jpg


If it's inversions you want, then take the Smiler. It has 14 inversions, but ends up being a complete mess of a ride. Us human can only take so much, and nausea starts setting in after too many inversions. An inversion subjects the human body to strong positive G forces (3.5 - 4.0 G's), then almost no G force (down to 0.8 G's typically), then back to high G's again, all in a short space of time. Our internal organs go from normal, to 4 times their weight, then almost weightless, then back to 4 times their weight again, then back to normal. After 14 times in a row, this can be a bit much. To factor this in, the ride layout has to have pace-breaks (moments of calm). The Smiler splits the ride into two, with a complete stop and second lift in the middle of the ride, this helps to spread it out a bit.
englands-the-smiler.jpg


If height is your thing, then there is Top Thrill Dragster and Kingda Ka, both around 420 ft tall (128m), which is the average height of a New York or London sky scraper. Speaking of sky scrapers, there is a new type of coaster bound for Orlando known as a poler coaster. This will be 570ft tall.
Skyplex_2015.jpg


As for speed, then Top Thrill Dragster and Kingda Ka both go around 128mph (206 kph) , but the ride time is only around 50 seconds because of it. The trouble with high speed is you cover a lot of distance in a short period of time, so the rides are equally huge. Formula Rossa holds the world record right now at 149mph (240 kph). It doesn't help that its built in a desert, as riders have to wear goggles to ride it in case anything goes in their eyes at that speed. The trains take a beating too, and the wheel are sprayed with water to accommodate the heat - not just from the track, but also the speed.
formula-rossa.jpg


So to answer your question, yes its because of money. But also land space, limitations of the human body, planning and engineering, limitations of engineering (stress on track and trains) which can make an investment worthless if it costs more to maintain and run than profit that it generates (see Ring Racer).
 
Top thrill may be less then a minute long, but it's the best time of your life.

It's only flaw is in wait times. You have to wait for:

1. The normal crowd that LOVES the ride.
2. The occasional times when the coaster didn't clear the hill, and has to go again (I'm always jealous of those that get that free ride LOL)
3. Inclement weather, including wind. If it's too windy, they temporarily shut down the ride.

My usual wait times for that ride are between 2 to 3 hours.. [woah]
 
Top Thrill was an amazing ride! I've only ridden it once though. It's been a long time since I've been to a park.
I detest standing in lines. I will do a three hour wait for a new ride once, but I won't do it again.[noob]

That Poler Coaster looks fun! I've seen video of it before.
 
Last edited:
stupid question maybe but why should 3D printing help? Mechanical parts especially the wheels need to be made out of really special metal that costs a lot (kind of similar to the fins in turbines wich are worth about 10.000$ per piece just because of the way they are manufactured.)
3D printing won't help with that because the material needed is the expencive part not the way it's made.
 
3D Printing is not a cure-all. 3D Printing has serious drawbacks if you want something really sturdy like say Rollercoasters. Printing Metal is possible, yes, but it could make the Parts brittle. In addition you would have to Sand all the Parts to make them smooth. Nobody wants a bumpy track. And i think it would take a lot more time than the traditional way. Have you seen a 3D Printer in operation? This stuff takes a looong time.
 
Expedition Everest at Disney's Animal Kingdom is $100million of extravagance. Disney is one of the few places that can afford such a coaster.
 
Back
Top Bottom