Cradle2Grave
Banned
A stupid question maybe, but, are all the stars real stars - as in they are all observed stars or are some 'made-up'?
There's about 130,000 real planetary objects IIRC. You will see that the real ones have catalogue names, such as HR, HIP, Gliese, HD etc. These can be found in official star catalogs.
As an amateur astronomer I can say that quite a lot of them are indeed real and those that are real are modeled quite closely on the actual characteristics of the real life stars. How cool is that? (Er if you're a complete geek like me)
It is all indeed utterly, brilliant, but the RNG can be a bit off. Where did all the Class B's go?
It is all indeed utterly, brilliant, but the RNG can be a bit off. Where did all the Class B's go?
As an amateur astronomer I can say that quite a lot of them are indeed real and those that are real are modeled quite closely on the actual characteristics of the real life stars. How cool is that? (Er if you're a complete geek like me)
I'm with you on geekery for astronomical accuracy.
I've found the occasional hiccup, but FDev are good about taking suggested corrections on board and implementing them in a major patch.
My personal "thing" is OB star associations. NGC 6823, NGC 6871, NGC 6231, NGC 6193 and NGC 7822 are all accounted for, star for star from the main star catalogues. I check that a cluster exists in game, go to SIMBAD and grab the full star list for that cluster, then map them star for star on Galaxy Map to make a bucket list of stars to visit.
If you want to test the accuracy of the Galaxy Map yourself, pick a constellation. Now look it up on Wikipedia and get the list of stars. Sort them by visual brightness, and make a note of their HD or HIP catalogue number. Now go to Galaxy Map and enter each HD/HIP number and see which star gets highlighted. The brightest star of Cygnus is Deneb, but looking it up by HD number turns up Alpha Cygni. Same star, just an alternative name for it.
I've already come across explorers on this forum mapping out constellations, and it makes me consider doing it myself when I get back from my deep space run.
Out of the 4 stars Wikipedia lists being 'component of the Trapezium' 2 are not in the game (at least there are no stars with their HIP or HD catalogue numbers, or by the name 'Theta1 Orionis A' or 'Theta1 Orionis C'), and 2 appear as their HIP numbered versions, but their locations seem very weird if they're supposed to be 'Theta1 Orionis B' and 'Theta1 Orionis D'.But also would it not be cool to visit the Trapezium Stars in that great star birth factory?
@Werppa: Kasterborous constellation, maybe?![]()
If the wiki listed four Trapezium stars they've missed some out - I can just about see the E and F stars with my scope.....Out of the 4 stars Wikipedia lists being 'component of the Trapezium' 2 are not in the game (at least there are no stars with their HIP or HD catalogue numbers, or by the name 'Theta1 Orionis A' or 'Theta1 Orionis C'), and 2 appear as their HIP numbered versions, but their locations seem very weird if they're supposed to be 'Theta1 Orionis B' and 'Theta1 Orionis D'.
BTW, what other names the star WASP-82 might be known, it doesn't appear with that name in E: D either?
I have the Cambridge Star Atlas and I was pondering doing exactly the same thing as you and mapping out some of the constellations. Again when I get back from my Jaunt.
I'm thinking that Orion may be a good place to go and check out as it has a myriad of very cool (geeky) stuff around that whole region. I'm told that Betelgeus is represented to scale!!! But also would it not be cool to visit the Trapezium Stars in that great star birth factory?