Then my opinion is that this should not be changed. You should be responsible for any actions that you take and if you choose to evade - then you take risk of taking damage in case you fail. An option to submit is always there.
You always fail to take other accountable reasons not to. First and obvious is that Authority can see our Clean status in super Cruse. As such they also have responsibility for their actions.
Second this is not about avoid or not to avoid as it is about the consequence. I agree there should be damage as consequence but it should not be a punishment. This rhetoric seen here is as if I demand removal of damage and not the voucher if it happens under certain conditions. You are still pushing your totalitarian attitude. I guess path to civil rights is very long one.
A player might be returning from some combat with another pirate and have broken canopy, even though clean he might be interdicted and best cause of action would be to avoid interdiction and run to station as fast as possible before his oxygen runs out. You can jump into super cruise quickly but you can't accelerate to previous speed as fast as you have been prior to interdiction. This alone justifies practice of avoiding interdictions.
Player might have very short limited time to complete a mission - this also can be reason to avoid interdiction. I agree there should be a consequence if avoidance fail but it should not be a punishment.