Rocks look out of place because not same colour as planet

A lot of people have complained that the rocks you find on the surface of planets look really out of place, artificial, etc. I think this is simply because the surface rocks don't have the same colour & brightness as the 'dusty' surface they are sitting on.

Just compare this example screenshot from Horizons:
yU7YUlZ.png


To these images of Mars:
mera_hills.jpg
mars2.jpg
Mars_rocks.jpg
vikinglander2-2.jpg


I'm sure that Horizons' surface rocks would look much more "natural" if they had similar colour & brightness as their surroundings. Now yes, there are certainly cases where surface rocks SHOULD be different to their surroundings (e.g. meteorites), but that's not 100% of the time like it is for Horizons:

PIA17944-MarsCuriosityRover-AfterCrossingDingoGapSanddune-20140209.jpg
mars-mera-sol-1000-panorama-release-mcmurdo-desk-1024.jpg
mars-surface-10603-mars-wallpaper.jpg


If I had to make a simple rule for Horizons' procedural generation, then I'd suggest that the smaller rocks should be the same colour & brightness as their surface, while the larger ones are less likely to be.

You *could* argue that Mars is not the best example, since it has an atmosphere & none of Horizons' landable planets do... But rocks on our Moon still look far more similar to their surface than Horizons':
chang-e-3-moon-surface.jpg

Change-3-landing-site-pano3H_Ken-Kremer.jpg

a16.1655702-mc.jpg


Rocks on the surface of a comet also look pretty similar to their surroundings (even once you allow for the fact the photo is B&W):
6662568-3x2-700x467.jpg

(Photo taken by Philae from an altitude of 67 metres.)

Same for the surface of Venus (although yes that has an atmosphere like Mars does):
Venera-9-image-of-surface-22-october-1975.jpg
vener13l.jpg
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom