Dear developers! We are the servants of Aisling Duval, and we would like to be a little outrage to the account of the possession of this system! In your pp2.0 there is absolutely no balance! The Santy system for which the moat fought in the purpose of the community was captured by the archer. We would like to know why we spent our personal time! If Jerome has very few agents, this is not our problem! In the purpose of the community, we won and would like to return our system back! I am very indignant on this issue of the hope of indulgence!
Santy System
- Thread starter Avgust_Rein
- Start date
-
- Tags
- aisling duval santy
True, I have spent entire weeks just fighting for santy system on aislings side and even with CG where aisling got 3 times the people and raised 68 billion credits (twice jerome had) we still lost santy by significant margin... At least add +% on system reinforcements for aisling
You had to oppose the acquisition not wasting time in CZs, perhaps with rares? Or using princess' other perks... Archer is good at combat.
Difference was pretty much significative.. like 11m for the barman vs. 4.8m of the blue-haired lady.
Difference was pretty much significative.. like 11m for the barman vs. 4.8m of the blue-haired lady.
Last edited:
Speaking about this, the developers removed + obtaining incentives from the capsule for salvation and now expanding the impact on the entire system is simply not vocal, but Archer is so good that there is + to capture! It is necessary to redirect all the strengths of all powers and I urge all Aisling agents to support me! We must also become police officers
But the 200% bonus for Black Box and Wreckage Components still apply. As a Kaine pledge (120% SAR bonus), I get 413 merits per black box. And this cycle I solo dropped some 40k control points into a system with about 10...12 hours of SAR work. Aisling should have it even better with her higher bonus (something like 560 merits per black box if my calculations are correct), make use of it, you folks are well-organized!
This was all according to a special clause in a new agreement that will be announced later this year, in late December.
The Santy Clause.
The Santy Clause.
True...but we don't know which system all those people fought in. I was fighting in Gondul for Aisling, which would have not effect on Santy.
You do not understand. Merits in contested systems do not give us. This is personally verified by me. And then what is the point of doing this?
The weird part to me is the fundamental imbalance of the undermining part. The CG was completely won, yet the Galnet chose to comment on the part completely unrelated to the CG. If you supported Aisling while not being pledged to her, your contribution had no impact on the powerplay side that was commented on Galnet, because you couldn't earn any merits towards reinforcing the system. Santy/Gondul very likely wouldn't have dropped from control.
So the result is this, Aisling wins the CG against both powers even if their bonds weren't split into two (LYR + Archer CGs got 65.4 billion total versus Aisling with 68.6 billion) but still loses (and doesn't regain) one of the systems. And the Galnet focused on that instead of you know, the thing that the CG was scoring.
So the result is this, Aisling wins the CG against both powers even if their bonds weren't split into two (LYR + Archer CGs got 65.4 billion total versus Aisling with 68.6 billion) but still loses (and doesn't regain) one of the systems. And the Galnet focused on that instead of you know, the thing that the CG was scoring.
Maybe Frontier looked at it that way:
Aisling vs LYR was fought over three systems, Aisling got twice the amount of contributions so she gets 2 systems and LYR one. Or maybe because LYR also reached tier one Frontier wanted to rewards them too. Or maybe Frontier just wanted Aisling to drop some systems for PP or story reasons. Hard to tell really.
(You can exchange LYR for Archer as well.)
Aisling vs LYR was fought over three systems, Aisling got twice the amount of contributions so she gets 2 systems and LYR one. Or maybe because LYR also reached tier one Frontier wanted to rewards them too. Or maybe Frontier just wanted Aisling to drop some systems for PP or story reasons. Hard to tell really.
(You can exchange LYR for Archer as well.)
I'm not an expert at PP2.0, isn't there a huge difference between undermining and fortified or stronghold system balance. Meaning it's much easier to undermine, by a factor of 3 or 4 compared to holding onto or advancing a fortified or stronghold system. So even if you had more players and more bonds, it wasn't enough to counter the undermining efforts from the two opposing factions.
Somebody set us up the bomb. Take off every zig. Make your time.
Stuff happens. Stuff happens in real life too. You could be sweeping the road perfectly clean for a week and then someone organises a ticker tape parade. I feel for you, and for what it's worth, most of us have felt the unfair hand of FDev in our activities at some time or another. I hope they cut you a break, good luck getting your stuff back.
Braben giveth and Braben taketh away.
Braben giveth and Braben taketh away.
All your base…
Ya all got braben'ed. Without "funny" tunel, none less!
Well, all you needed to do, was to protect it better, along doing said CG.
From what it looks like, Archer cmdrs did "snatch" santy from Aisling cmdrs, regardless of CG result. Seems like PP2 went its own way, but thats how its designed?
I fail to see any faulty there.... other than aisling's not keeping up with archer's, in powerplay games.