I would like to hear more thoughts about this, but I really find scarab physics model little too "paperweight" and prone to turns and slides regardless of actual G value of the planet.
It just doesn't feel right to me for some reason, and I think there is room for improvement.
I also want to mention randomness in rock coliding - it makes me nervous and puts unpleasent feeling by not knowing if next rock will pass through my Scarab like nothing happened or it will turn it 180 degrees.
I think making only some rocks having hitboxes a bad idea, and I would also like to see some more variety in their sizes and amounts on different planets.
I haven't yet found "clear surface" planet where I can just drive full speed and have some fun, but that's maybe just on me.
It just doesn't feel right to me for some reason, and I think there is room for improvement.
I also want to mention randomness in rock coliding - it makes me nervous and puts unpleasent feeling by not knowing if next rock will pass through my Scarab like nothing happened or it will turn it 180 degrees.
I think making only some rocks having hitboxes a bad idea, and I would also like to see some more variety in their sizes and amounts on different planets.
I haven't yet found "clear surface" planet where I can just drive full speed and have some fun, but that's maybe just on me.
Last edited: