Has anyone tested the SCO on all the ships to judge whether some handle it better than others? We know the Python MKII handles it exceptionally well as a perk, but I was wondering if some of the regular ships handled it slightly better (or worse!) than average naturally. It would be neat if there had been some range in terms of how these ship handle the SCO (obvioulsy with the Python MKII being the best, not trying to take that away from it)
Also, I was thinking, with thousands of regular FSD drives going into forever-storage, perhaps a future tweak could be added to make them competitive again. What if Sirius Corporation introduced a new (free) firmware patch (or some other jargon) that allows the previously difficult to modify proprietary FSD drives to be easier to tweak, not only reducing engineering costs, but allowing ALL Sirius FSDs to have two engineering mods added.
Now that's not exactly going to compete with the SCO... even if you match or beat the jump range, it's still going to have that oh-so-convenient overdrive feature. However, it would be something that might make some experimental commanders keep tinkering with Sirius FSDs instead of relegating them to the scrapheap of history.
Also, I was thinking, with thousands of regular FSD drives going into forever-storage, perhaps a future tweak could be added to make them competitive again. What if Sirius Corporation introduced a new (free) firmware patch (or some other jargon) that allows the previously difficult to modify proprietary FSD drives to be easier to tweak, not only reducing engineering costs, but allowing ALL Sirius FSDs to have two engineering mods added.
Now that's not exactly going to compete with the SCO... even if you match or beat the jump range, it's still going to have that oh-so-convenient overdrive feature. However, it would be something that might make some experimental commanders keep tinkering with Sirius FSDs instead of relegating them to the scrapheap of history.